CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2022; 4: (5) ; 11-13 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20220195.

Curative effect of Wet Healing Therapy on poor healing of surgical incision in patientswith gynecological tumors
湿性愈合疗法治疗妇科肿瘤患者手术切口愈合不良的疗效

作者: 张媚 *, 邱小芳

中山大学附属第一医院 广东广州

*通讯作者: 张媚,单位:中山大学附属第一医院 广东广州;

发布时间: 2022-09-05 总浏览量: 392

摘要

目的 针对妇科肿瘤患者在手术后切口不良情况,采取湿性愈合疗法治疗的效果进行分析。方法 本次的研究对象从我院在2018年3月到21年3月收入的妇科肿瘤患者中选取,入选患者均在手术治疗后出现了手术切口愈合不良情况,共20例。通过编号奇偶数划分为对照组(采取常规切口处理方式,9例)与研究组(采取湿性愈合疗法,11例)。对两组的切口疼痛程度、换药次数以及住院时间进行记录和比较。结果 两组的疼痛情况对比无显著差异(P>0.05),换药次数(15.61±4.37)次和住院时间(24.89±3.92)d研究组均少于对照组(19.89±4.51)次、(28.45±3.07)d(P<0.05)。结论 针对妇科肿瘤患者在手术后切口不良情况,采取湿性愈合疗法治疗,能够有效减轻切口疼痛程度,促进切口愈合。

关键词: 湿性愈合疗法;妇科肿瘤;手术切口

Abstract

Objective to investigate the condition of poor incision in patients with gynecological tumors after surgery, the effect of wet healing therapy was analyzed.
Methods 20 cases of gynecologic tumor patients were selected from our hospital from December 2018 to November 2018. All the patients had poor wound healing after operation. The odd and even numbers were divided into control group (9 cases treated with conventional incision) and study group (11 cases treated with wet healing) . The degree of pain, times of dressing change and length of hospital stay were recorded and compared between the two groups.
Results There was no significant difference in pain between the two groups (P>0.05), the number of dressing changes (15.61±4.37) and the length of hospital stay (24.89±3.92) days in the study group were less than those in the control group (19.89±4.51), (28.45±4.51) 3.07) d (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   Wet Healing Therapy can effectively reduce the degree of incision pain and promote incision healing in gynecological tumor patients with poor incision after operation.

Key words: Wet Healing Therapy; Gynecological tumor; Surgical incision

参考文献 References

[1] 靳欢,王晓莹,杨秋香,等.湿性愈合法在术后伤口愈合护理中的应用价值[J].中国医学工程,2019,27(6):153.

[2] 陈堂珍,何静.妇科肿瘤患者术后切口愈合不良影响因素及湿性愈合干预机制研究[J].国际护理学杂志,2020,39(23):4282-4285.

[3] 申云开,闫立红,李利平,等.湿润烧伤膏配合康复新湿敷治疗术后切口愈合不良的临床观察[J].中国民间疗法,2020,28(6):42-44.

[4] 康信礼,涂淑强,黄科棣.康复新液外用治疗Pilon骨折术后切口延迟愈合疗效观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2020,13(13):79-80.

[5] 王海焦,胡光云,王小俊.火针联合湿型敷料治疗慢性难愈性伤口疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2020,39(11):82-86.

[6] 刘世虎.湿性敷料在外科缝合手术术后伤口愈合不良中应用效果的观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(75):77,80.

[7] 喻星逸,李应菊. 湿性愈合法在慢性伤口治疗中的临床应用[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2019,40(8):146-148.

[8] 邵芬娣,娄海飞,梅慧飞. 湿性愈合疗法在腹部手术切口感染中护理效果[J]. 中国药物与临床,2019,19(7):1184-1186.

引用本文

张媚, 邱小芳, 湿性愈合疗法治疗妇科肿瘤患者手术切口愈合不良的疗效[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2022; 4: (5) : 11-13.