Application effect of standardized evidence-based nursing in cerebral infarction nursing
标准化循证护理在脑梗死护理中的应用效果观察

摘要

目的 探讨脑梗死护理中应用标准化循证护理的效果。方法：将我院2021年2月~2022年2月这一年中，收治的脑梗死患者，选择78例患者进行研究，按照随机数字表法对患者分组护理，39例患者为对照组，接受常规化护理，另外39例患者为观察组，应用标准化循证护理，展开2组患者护理的功能恢复情况。结果：观察组患者与对照组患者的NIHSS评分、Fugl-Meyer评分相比，护理前差异无统计学意义，（P＞0.05），护理后要比护理前的各项评分有所变化，其中观察组患者的NIHSS评分、Fugl-Meyer评分显著更优，（P＜0.05）；此外，护理前2组患者的SAS评分、SF-36评分相比差异不显著，（P＞0.05），经过护理之后，2组患者的SAS评分、SF-36评分要比护理前有所改善，且观察组患者的各项评分优于对照组患者，（P＜0.05）。结论：对于脑梗死患者的护理，临床应用标准化循证护理的效果最佳，利于改善患者的运动功能与神经功能，促进其尽早康复，值得推广。

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effect of applying standardized evidence-based nursing in cerebral infarction nursing. Method: to our hospital in February 2021 to February 2022 this year, admitted to cerebral infarction patients, select 78 patients for study, according to the random number table method of patients group care, 39 patients for control group, accept routine care, another 39 patients for observation group, the application of standardized evidence-based care, care 2 patients functional recovery.
Results: Compared with the NIHSS scores and the Fugl-Meyer scores of the observation group patients and the control group patients, There was no significant difference in precare, (P>0.05), After nursing compared to the scores before nursing, The NIHSS score and Fugl-Meyer score were significantly better in the observation group, (P<0.05); besides, The SAS score and SF-36 score of the first 2 groups were not significant, (P>0.05), After the nursing care, The SAS score in group 2, SF-36 score were improved than before care, Moreover, the scores of observation group were better than those of control group, (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : For the nursing of patients with cerebral infarction, the clinical application of standardized evidence-based nursing has the best effect, which is conducive to improving their motor function and neurological function, and promoting their early recovery, which is worth promoting.