Analysis of the effect of nursing intervention on improving the correct rate of inhaler use in patients with bronchial asthma
护理干预对提高支气管哮喘患者吸入剂使用正确率的作用分析

摘要

目的 分析护理干预对提高支气管哮喘患者吸入剂使用正确率的作用。方法 回顾性分析70例支气管哮喘患者临床资料，护理时间为2020年1月-2022年4月，随机分两组，丙组35例患者，采用护理干预，丁组35例患者，采用常规干预，对比丙组及丁组患者的护理结局。结果 丙组吸入剂应用合格率从表1看高于丁组患者，组间差异大，有统计学意义(P<0.05)。丙组吸入剂应用错误的患者从表2看少于丁组患者，组间差异大，有统计学意义(P<0.05)。丙组肺功能指标从表3看优于丁组患者，组间差异大，有统计学意义(P<0.05)。丙组症状消失时间从表4看短于丁组患者，组间差异大，有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 护理干预对提高支气管哮喘患者吸入剂使用正确率的作用更大，值得广泛利用。

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effect of nursing intervention on improving the correct rate of inhaler use in patients with bronchial asthma.
Methods the clinical data of 70 patients with bronchial asthma were retrospectively analyzed. The nursing time was from January 2020 to April 2022. They were randomly divided into two groups. 35 patients in group C were taken off the machine for nursing, and 35 patients in group D were taken routine nursing. The nursing outcomes of patients in group C and group D were compared.
Results the qualified rate of inhaler application in group C was higher than that in group D from table 1, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). From table 2, the number of patients in group C who used inhalers incorrectly was less than that in group D, and the difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05). According to table 3, the pulmonary function indexes of group C were better than those of group D, with significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). According to table 4, the time of symptom disappearance in group C was shorter than that in group D, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   nursing intervention has a greater effect on improving the correct rate of inhaler use in patients with bronchial asthma, and is worth extensive use.