期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2022; 4: (8) ; 38-40 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20220353.

Nursing observation of patients with cor pulmonale after mechanical ventilation
肺心病患者多次机械通气撤机护理观察

作者: 王李佩 *

榆林市第二医院呼吸内科二病区 陕西榆林

*通讯作者: 王李佩,单位:榆林市第二医院呼吸内科二病区 陕西榆林;

发布时间: 2022-12-31 总浏览量: 221

摘要

目的 分析肺心病患者多次机械通气撤机护理价值更大。方法 回顾性分析66例肺心病患者临床资料,护理时间为2020年1月-2022年4月,随机分两组,a组33例患者,采用撤机护理,b组33例患者,采用常规护理,对比a组及b组患者的护理结局。结果 a组护理满意度从表1看高于b组患者,组间差异大,有统计学意义P<0.05。护理前,a组负面情绪评分从表2看接近于b组患者P>0.05;护理后,a组负面情绪评分从表2看高于b组患者,组间差异大,有统计学意义P<0.05。护理前,a组生存质量评分从表3看接近于b组患者P>0.05;护理后,a组生存质量评分从表3看高于b组患者,组间差异大,有统计学意义P<0.05。结论 肺心病患者多次机械通气撤机护理效果更突出,值得广泛利用。

关键词: 肺心病患者;机械通气;撤机护理

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of nursing for patients with cor pulmonale after multiple mechanical ventilation withdrawals.
Methods the clinical data of 66 patients with cor pulmonale were retrospectively analyzed. The nursing time was from January 2020 to April 2022. They were randomly divided into two groups. 33 patients in group A were taken off the machine for nursing, and 33 patients in group B were taken routine nursing. The nursing outcomes of patients in group a and group B were compared.
Results from table 1, the nursing satisfaction of group A was higher than that of group B, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Before nursing, the negative emotion score of group A was close to that of group B (P > 0.05) according to table 2; After nursing, the scores of negative emotions in group A were higher than those in group B as shown in Table 2. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Before nursing, the quality of life score of group A was close to that of group B from table 3 (P > 0.05); After nursing, the quality of life score of group A was higher than that of group B in Table 3, with significant difference between groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   the nursing effect of multiple mechanical ventilation for patients with cor pulmonale is more prominent, and it is worth extensive use.

Key words: Patients with cor pulmonale; Mechanical ventilation; Evacuation nursing

参考文献 References

[1] 陈玲玲,杜小艳,朱天霞,张春旭,蔡婷玉.以改良版PEWS为基础的专科护理对机械通气患儿并发症、预后及护理质量的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(17):120-122.

[2] 区晓芬,区晓珊,冯焕珍,吴庆妮,杨小莲.以HAPA为基础的细节护理在重症肺炎ARDS机械通气患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(17):128-131.

[3] 刘梅芳,石瑞莹.基于循证基础的集束化护理措施对ICU行机械通气患者呼吸机使用效率和护理质量的影响[J].医学理论与实践,2022,35(16):2823-2826.

[4] 易丽霞,吴素文.无缝隙护理在新生儿肺炎机械通气治疗护理中的应用及对新生儿肺功能的影响[J].吉林医学,2022,43(08):2303-2305.

[5] 邓祥敏,张玉霞,单娜,王静娜.以指南为基础的气道内吸引集束化护理策略在NICU有创机械通气早产儿中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(15):54-57.

[6] 何丹.振动排痰仪联合预防性护理干预在ICU机械通气患者中的应用价值[J].医疗装备,2022,35(14):146-148.

[7] 王敏,张艳.创新型护理流程模式应用于ICU机械通气患者中的效果分析[J].现代医药卫生,2022,38(14): 2468-2472.

[8] 黄惠丽,卫晓梅,常俊辉.多学科协作护理模式对机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎发生的影响[J].航空航天医学杂志,2022,33(07):891-894.

[9] 刘娟.重症谵妄预测模型框架下的风险分级预防护理对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气时间及睡眠质量的影响[J].黑龙江医学,2022,46(14):1782-1784.

[10] 梁莉莉.分析体位与细节护理相结合在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征应用机械通气治疗中的作用[J].中国社区医师,2022,38(19):121-123.

[11] 刁燕婷,刘文惠,杨丽梅,叶新连.责任制护理干预对机械通气治疗早产儿呼吸机相关性肺炎发生的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2022,26(21):117-119.

[12] 边雪琼子.合理情绪护理干预对尘肺合并肺心病患者治疗效果和生存质量的影响[J].微量元素与健康研究,2022,39(04):83-84.

[13] 于小溪.家庭参与的袋鼠式护理对呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气早产儿康复及护理满意度的影响研究[J].黑龙江医学,2022,46(12):1517-1519.

[14] 林晶,刘晓金,陈丽容,黄晓琳.儿童重症监护病房机械通气患儿肠内营养不耐受危险因素及预防护理研究[J].全科护理,2022,20(17):2423-2426.

[15] 陈新胜,李寅.JCI理念指导下的集束化护理模式对肺心病合并呼吸衰竭机械通气患者的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(24):3801-3804.

引用本文

王李佩, 肺心病患者多次机械通气撤机护理观察[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2022; 4: (8) : 38-40.