Nursing observation of patients with cor pulmonale after mechanical ventilation
肺心病患者多次机械通气撤机护理观察

摘要

目的 分析肺心病患者多次机械通气撤机护理价值更大。方法 回顾性分析66例肺心病患者临床资料，护理时间为2020年1月-2022年4月，随机分两组，a组33例患者，采用撤机护理，b组33例患者，采用常规护理，对比a组及b组患者的护理结局。结果 a组护理满意度从表1看高于b组患者，组间差异大，有统计学意义P<0.05。护理前，a组负面情绪评分从表2看接近于b组患者P>0.05；护理后，a组负面情绪评分从表2看高于b组患者，组间差异大，有统计学意义P<0.05。护理前，a组生存质量评分从表3看接近于b组患者P>0.05；护理后，a组生存质量评分从表3看高于b组患者，组间差异大，有统计学意义P<0.05。结论 肺心病患者多次机械通气撤机护理效果更突出，值得广泛利用。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of nursing for patients with cor pulmonale after multiple mechanical ventilation withdrawals.
Methods the clinical data of 66 patients with cor pulmonale were retrospectively analyzed. The nursing time was from January 2020 to April 2022. They were randomly divided into two groups. 33 patients in group A were taken off the machine for nursing, and 33 patients in group B were taken routine nursing. The nursing outcomes of patients in group a and group B were compared.
Results from table 1, the nursing satisfaction of group A was higher than that of group B, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Before nursing, the negative emotion score of group A was close to that of group B (P > 0.05) according to table 2; After nursing, the scores of negative emotions in group A were higher than those in group B as shown in Table 2. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Before nursing, the quality of life score of group A was close to that of group B from table 3 (P > 0.05); After nursing, the quality of life score of group A was higher than that of group B in Table 3, with significant difference between groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   the nursing effect of multiple mechanical ventilation for patients with cor pulmonale is more prominent, and it is worth extensive use.