期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2023; 5: (1) ; 25-27 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20230008.

Observation on the effect of nursing intervention for patients with peptic ulcer with bad living habits
消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果观察

作者: 荆玉洁 *

空军第九八六医院 陕西西安

*通讯作者: 荆玉洁,单位:空军第九八六医院 陕西西安;

发布时间: 2023-01-31 总浏览量: 227

摘要

目的 分析消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果。方法 回顾性分析106例消化性溃疡患者临床资料,入院时间均为2020年3月-2022年5月,随机分两组,Ⅰ组53例患者,采用护理干预,Ⅱ组53例患者,采用常规干预,比较Ⅰ组及Ⅱ组患者的护理效果。结果 Ⅰ组溃疡愈合率与HP根除率从表1看出明显高于Ⅱ组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Ⅰ组生活质量评分从表2看出明显高于Ⅱ组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,Ⅰ组负面情绪评分与Ⅱ组比较区别较小,无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,Ⅰ组及Ⅱ组患者的负面情绪评分均有所改善,Ⅰ组负面情绪评分从表3看出明显低于Ⅱ组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果尤为突出,值得临床推广利用。

关键词: 护理干预;消化道溃疡;护理;临床效果

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effect of nursing intervention on patients with peptic ulcer with bad living habits.
Methods The clinical data of 106 patients with peptic ulcer were retrospectively analyzed. The admission time was from March 2020 to May 2022. They were randomly divided into two groups, group I (53 patients) and group II (53 patients). The nursing effects of group I and group II were compared.
Results The ulcer healing rate and HP eradication rate in group I were significantly higher than those in group II (P<0.05). The quality of life score of group I was significantly higher than that of group II (P<0.05). Before the intervention, there was little difference in negative emotion score between group I and group II, and there was no statistical significance (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the scores of negative emotions of patients in group I and group II were improved, and the scores of negative emotions in group I were significantly lower than those in group II, which was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The effect of nursing intervention for patients with peptic ulcer with bad living habits is particularly prominent, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Nursing Intervention; Gastrointestinal Ulcer; Nursing; Clinical Effect

参考文献 References

[1] 张锐英,卢少贞.综合性护理在改善消化性溃疡患者不良情绪及生活质量的影响观察[J].中国医药科学,2017, 7(19): 158-160.

[2] 刘双.心理护理干预对消化性溃疡患者不良情绪的影响观察[J].中国农村卫生,2020,12(24):62.

[3] 杨卫琴,曹奇峰.针对性护理对消化性溃疡患者依从性和心理状态的影响[J].中国乡村医药,2020,27(10):63-64.

[4] 付飒飒.对消化性溃疡患者实施分期及系统护理的实践体会[J].当代护士(上旬刊),2020,27(05):58-60.

[5] 卢肖雪.延续性护理干预对消化性溃疡患者临床疗效、依从性以及预后的影响[J].中国农村卫生,2020, 12(02):63.

[6] 李志群.综合护理干预对慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡患者生活质量的影响分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2020, 7(01):115+119.

[7] 刘薇.护理干预在慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡患者护理中的应用[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2019,4(50):70+77.

[8] 屈红,万晓燕,李岩青.临床护理路径在消化性溃疡患者健康教育中的运用效果分析[J].国际感染病学(电子版),2019,8(03):160.

[9] 覃艳芳.强化护理干预在提高消化性溃疡患者护理质量及满意度中的应用[J].基层医学论坛,2019,23(24): 3453-3441.

[10] 马晓丽.优质护理干预在慢性胃炎合并消化性溃疡中的应用效果[J].慢性病学杂志,2019,20(07):1062-1064.

[11] 赵亚娟.个性化护理在慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡患者中的应用效果及对身心状态的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2019,4(20):177-179.

[12] 王芳.护理干预应用在老年性消化性溃疡患者中的实施效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(33):279+281.

[13] 叶华艳.慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡患者的综合护理方式及护理效果观察[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2019,4(03): 148+151.

[14] 陈世聪,廖永华,曹明辉,彭婕敏.研究综合护理干预对慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡患者生活质量的影响[J].影像研究与医学应用,2018,2(07):31-34.

[15] 张锐英,卢少贞.综合性护理在改善消化性溃疡患者不良情绪及生活质量的影响观察[J].中国医药科学,2017, 7(19): 158-160.

引用本文

荆玉洁, 消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果观察[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2023; 5: (1) : 25-27.