Open Access Article
International Journal of Nursing Research. 2023; 5: (2) ; 88-90 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20230078.
Effect of outpatient collaborative nursing combined with psychological intervention on adverse emotion, quality of life and self-efficacy of outpatients with coronary heart disease
门诊协同护理联合心理干预对冠心病门诊患者不良情绪、生活质量及自我效能的影响
作者:
张雯 *
江苏省溧阳市中医医院 江苏溧阳
*通讯作者:
张雯,单位:江苏省溧阳市中医医院 江苏溧阳;
发布时间: 2023-02-28 总浏览量: 321
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
万方数据(WANFANG DATA)
摘要
目的 探讨门诊协同护理联合心理干预对冠心病门诊患者不良情绪、生活质量及自我效能的影响。方法 将我院2021年1月-2021年12月100例冠心病门诊患者,双盲随机法分二组。对照组给予常规护理,实验组实施门诊协同护理联合心理干预。比较两组护理前后焦虑SAS评分和抑郁SDS评分、生活质量评分、自我效能感评分、护理满意度。结果 护理前两组焦虑SAS评分和抑郁SDS评分、生活质量评分、自我效能感评分比较,P>0.05,护理后两组焦虑SAS评分和抑郁SDS评分均显著降低,生活质量评分、自我效能感评分均显著升高,而其中实验组焦虑SAS评分和抑郁SDS评分显著低于对照组,生活质量评分、自我效能感评分均显著高于对照组,P<0.05。实验组的护理满意度比对照组高(P<0.05)。结论 冠心病门诊患者实施门诊协同护理联合心理干预效果确切,可减轻患者的不良情绪,提高其自我效能,并提高患者的生活质量,是一种值得推广的护理方案。
关键词: 门诊协同护理;心理干预;冠心病门诊患者;不良情绪;生活质量;自我效能;影响
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of outpatient collaborative nursing combined with psychological intervention on adverse emotion, quality of life and self-efficacy of outpatients with coronary heart disease. Methods: 100 outpatients with coronary heart disease in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were randomly divided into two groups. The control group received routine nursing, while the experimental group received outpatient collaborative nursing combined with psychological intervention. The anxiety SAS score, depression SDS score, quality of life score, self-efficacy score and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after nursing. Results: the scores of anxiety SAS and depression SDS, quality of life and self-efficacy in the two groups before nursing were compared (P > 0.05). After nursing, the scores of anxiety SAS and depression SDS in the two groups were significantly lower, and the scores of quality of life and self-efficacy were significantly higher. Among them, the scores of anxiety SAS and depression SDS in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the scores of quality of life and self-efficacy were significantly higher than those in the control group, P<0.05. The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05) Conclusion : the effect of outpatient collaborative nursing combined with psychological intervention for coronary heart disease outpatients is accurate. It can reduce the patients' bad mood, improve their self-efficacy, and improve the patients' quality of life. It is a nursing program worthy of promotion.
Key words: Outpatient collaborative nursing; Psychological intervention; Outpatients with coronary heart disease; Bad mood; Quality of life; Self efficacy; influence
参考文献 References
[1] 王鑫. 健康教育和心理护理在冠心病心绞痛患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药,2022,29(10):194-196.
[2] 李美霞. 心理护理对冠心病患者负性情绪的影响[J]. 心理月刊,2022,17(04):146-148.
[3] 孙雪,孙娜娜,李明. 系统化心理护理联合健康教育对冠心病心绞痛患者的效果分析[J]. 心理月刊,2022, 17(04): 176-177+186.
[4] 陈少源,林海宁,陈小雁,刘美铃. 基于协同护理模式的舒适护理在冠心病患者中的干预效果[J]. 心血管病防治知识,2022,12(06):49-51.
[5] 曹玉瑶. 心理护理干预对冠心病患者负性情绪的影响[J]. 中国医药指南,2022,20(04):180-182.
[6] 熊柳燕. 心理护理在冠心病心绞痛患者的应用效果[J]. 中国社区医师,2022,38(01):129-131.
引用本文
张雯, 门诊协同护理联合心理干预对冠心病门诊患者不良情绪、生活质量及自我效能的影响[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2023; 5: (2) : 88-90.