Observation on the effect of comfort nursing intervention in interventional nursing of patients with liver cancer
舒适护理干预在肝癌患者介入护理中的应用效果观察

摘要

目的 分析在介入护理中舒适护理干预的应用效果。方法 选取2022年3月~2023年2月介入治疗肝癌患者100例，A组50例行舒适护理干预，B组50例行常规介入护理，比较疼痛程度、炎性反应与舒适度情况。结果 疼痛程度比较，A组NRS[（3.01 ± 0.89）分]低于B组[（4.49 ± 1.04）分]，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；炎性反应比较，A组IL-6[（30.27 ± 8.06）pg/ml]低于B组[（42.19 ± 7.41）pg/ml]，A组hs-CRP[（11.03 ± 3.44）pg/ml]低于B组[（19.04 ± 7.01）pg/ml]，A组TNF-α[（0.53 ± 0.31）mg/L]低于B组[（1.40 ± 0.47）pmg/L]，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；舒适度比较，A组[84.00 %（42/50）]高于B组[74.00 %（37/50）]，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 应用舒适护理干预进行肝癌介入护理，可有效减轻疼痛，缓解炎性反应，提高舒适度。

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the application effect of comfort nursing intervention in interventional nursing.
Methods: From March 2022 to February 2023, 100 cases of patients with liver cancer were selected from interventional therapy, including 50 cases in group A and 50 cases in group B using the conventional interventional nursing mode, and the degree of pain, inflammatory response and comfort of the two groups were compared.
Results: The NRS of group A was (3.01 ± 0.89) points and that of group B was (4.49 ± 1.04) points. The pain of group A was lower, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The inflammatory response was (30.27 ± 8.06) pg/ml in group A, (42.19 ± 7.41) pg/ml in group B, lower IL-6 in group A, and (11.03 ± 3.44) pg/ml in group A. hs-CRP in group B was (19.04 ± 7.01) pg/ml], hs-CRP in group A was lower, TNF-α in group A was (0.53 ± 0.31) mg/L, TNF-α in group B was (1.40 ± 0.47) pmg/L, and TNF-α in group A was lower. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The comfort level of group A was 84.00 % (42/50) and that of group B was 74.00 % (37/50). The comfort level of group A was higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusion  : Using comfort nursing intervention mode in the process of interventional nursing of liver cancer can effectively relieve pain, relieve inflammatory response and improve the comfort level of patients.