摘要
目的 研究人文关怀护理干预用于重症肺炎患者的效果。方法 病例是2022年收治的90例重症肺炎患者。常规干预组内，45例接受常规护理。人文关怀护理干预组内，45例接受人文关怀护理干预。观察效果。结果 人文关怀护理干预组的遵医依从性评分，对比常规干预组[（3.64±0.33）分对比（2.29±0.21）分]更高，p＜0.05。人文关怀护理干预组的焦虑（HAMA）评分，对比常规干预组[（6.89±0.44）分对比（9.78±1.14）分]更低，p＜0.05。人文关怀护理干预组的人工气道时间，对比常规干预组[（6.15±1.03）d对比（9.48±1.58）d]更短，p＜0.05。人文关怀护理干预组的并发症发生率，对比常规干预组（2.22%对比22.22%）更低，p＜0.05。人文关怀护理干预组的病情控制优良率，对比常规干预组（97.78%对比77.78%）更高，p＜0.05。结论 将人文关怀护理干预，用于重症肺炎患者，对病情控制的影响更加显著。
关键词： 人文关怀护理干预；重症肺炎；病情控制
Abstract
Objective To study the effect of humanistic care intervention in patients with severe pneumonia. Methods The cases were 90 patients with severe pneumonia admitted in 2022. Within the routine intervention group, 45 patients received usual care. Within the humanistic care intervention group, 45 patients received the humanistic care care intervention. Observe effect. Results Compliance score in the humanistic care intervention group was higher than in the conventional intervention group [(3.64 ± 0.33) versus (2.29 ± 0.21)], p <0.05. The anxiety (HAMA) score in the humanistic care intervention group was lower than in the conventional intervention group [(6.89 ± 0.44) versus (9.78 ± 1.14)], p <0.05. The artificial airway time in the humanistic care intervention group was shorter than the conventional intervention group [(6.15 ± 1.03) d versus (9.48 ± 1.58) d], p <0.05. The complication rate in the humanistic care intervention group was lower than in the conventional intervention group (2.22% versus 22.22%), p <0.05. The excellent rate of excellent condition control in the humanistic care intervention group was higher than that in the conventional intervention group (97.78% versus 77.78%), p <0.05. Conclusion The humanistic care intervention for patients with severe pneumonia has a more significant impact on disease control.
Key words： Humanistic care and nursing intervention; Severe pneumonia; Disease control
参考文献 References
[1] 赵清芳.老年重症肺炎并发VAP患者实施以人文关怀为导向的预见性护理干预的效果[J].中外医学研究,2021, 19(24): 63-66.
[2] 王丹丹,杨佳佳,王宁等.人文关怀在重症肺炎患者中的护理效果分析[J].黑龙江中医药,2021,50(04):362-363.
[3] 崔红,于红,王小溪.以人文关怀为主的优质护理干预在老年重症肺炎患者中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2021, 28(07): 214-216.
[4] 马清华,王贤华,邢艳蒙.人文关怀护理对新冠肺炎患者负性情绪、睡眠质量的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(01): 46-48.
[5] 曹小燕,张宇遥,彭娟等.人文关怀护理在缓解新型冠状病毒重症肺炎患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响研究[J].中国社区医师,2020,36(27):137-138.
[6] 俞琳琳.人文关怀护理在特勤人员训练伤康复理疗患者中的应用[J].中国疗养医学,2020,29(06):595-596.
[7] 张理花,陈娅薇.以人文关怀为主的优质护理干预在老年重症肺炎患者的应用评价[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(05): 419-422.
[8] 何涤凡,罗胜利,雷华艳.人文关怀护理对高龄重症肺炎患者负性情绪、希望水平和生活质量的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(11):38-41.
[9] 任丽君.以人文关怀为主的优质护理干预对老年重症肺炎患者的应用效果观察[J].首都食品与医药,2019,26(09): 172-173.
[10] 李燕怡,冷菲菲,白琳.人文关怀护理对ICU VAP患者死亡率的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(24):151-153.