摘要
目的 探讨手术中CORN压力性损伤量表的应用。方法 选取2022年7月~2023年7月内于我院行手术治疗的患者96例，使用随机对照方式分为对照组（Braden量表评估）和观察组（CORN量表评估）各48例，对比不同量表评估后对患者实施相应处理的效果。结果 术中观察组评估分数低于对照组，且评估时间短于对照组，且并发症总发生率明显低于对照组，差异均存在统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 在手术中使用CORN压力性损伤量表对患者术中压力性损伤进行评估能够显著减少术后压疮等并发症的发生，且该方式评估时间较短，具有应用价值。
关键词： CORN压力性损伤量表；Braden；SDS；SAS
Abstract
Objective To explore the application of the CORN pressure injury scale during surgery. Methods 96 patients who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from July 2022 to July 2023 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (evaluated by Braden scale) and an observation group (evaluated by CORN scale), with 48 patients in each group. The effects of corresponding treatments on patients evaluated by different scales were compared. Results The evaluation score of the intraoperative observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the evaluation time was shorter than that of the control group. The total incidence of complications was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion The use of CORN pressure injury scale during surgery to evaluate intraoperative pressure injury in patients can significantly reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications such as pressure ulcers, and this method has a short evaluation time and practical value.
Key words： CORN Pressure Injury Scale; Braden; SDS; SAS
参考文献 References
[1] 潘闰梅. CORN术中压力性损伤量表在手术室皮肤管理中的应用研究[J]. 医学理论与实践,2024,37(2):318-320,345.
[2] 李会娟,刘瑾,傅晓瑾,等. 成人压力性损伤减压方法研究进展[J]. 军事护理,2024,41(5):97-100.
[3] 高兴莲,郭莉,何丽,等. 术中获得性压力性损伤预防专家共识[J]. 护理学杂志,2023,38(1):44-47.
[4] 杨可娜,徐玲芬,吴文瑾,等. 红外热成像技术用于压力性损伤评估的研究进展[J]. 护理研究,2023,37(8):1439-1442.
[5] 刘欢,丁乾容,尹万红,等. 床旁超声用于压力性损伤评估的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志,2022,37(1):95-99.
[6] 许冰吟,李智,李冬雪,等. 成人术中压力性损伤评估量表预测效能的Meta分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2023,29(12): 1576-1582.
[7] 牛彦斌,王秀梅,张伟业. 围术期患者压力性损伤评估工具研究现状分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘（连续型电子期刊）,2020,20(96):82-83.
[8] 申文冬,傅娴,谢文君. Norton量表与Braden量表在术中急性压力性损伤评估中的应用效果比较[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2020,26(24):34-36.