CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2024; 6: (10) ; 37-43 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20240322.

Factors influencing mortality in adult trauma patients-meta-analysis
影响成人创伤患者死亡率的因素-Meta分析

作者: 邹立成1,2, 高红2 *, 何沙沙1,2, 蒋丹丹2, 江卫男1,2

1南华大学护理学院 湖南衡阳

2南华大学附属第二医院 湖南衡阳

*通讯作者: 高红,单位:南华大学附属第二医院 湖南衡阳;

发布时间: 2024-10-28 总浏览量: 51

摘要

目的 评估影响创伤患者死亡的主要危险因素。方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方、知网和维普数据库中截至2023年10月的相关文献。纳入年龄≥18岁创伤患者的队列研究或病例对照研究,排除数据无法转换成OR值及综述、个案报道、病例分析等无相关数据的文献。最终纳入17篇文献,共计5909例患者。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对文献质量进行评价,采用STATA 17.0软件进行Meta分析。结果 Meta分析结果显示,以下因素显著增加创伤患者的死亡风险:年龄(≥60岁,OR=3.68, 95%CI: 2.28-5.24, P<0.001)、颅脑损伤(OR=2.26, 95%CI: 1.37-3.71, P=0.001)、休克指数(>1.0,OR=5.43, 95%CI :3.54-8.34, P<0.001)、GCS评分(≤8,OR=11.39, 95%CI: 1.96-66.37, P=0.007)、乳酸水平(OR=1.43, 95%CI: 1.26-1.61, P=0.000)、就诊时间(OR=3.58, 95%CI :2.10-6.12, P<0.001)和ISS评分(≥16,OR=15.45, 95%CI: 9.61-24.81, P<0.001)。机械通气与创伤患者死亡之间无显著关联(OR=1.14, 95%CI: 0.69-1.88, P=0.600)。结论 本Meta分析识别了多个显著影响创伤患者死亡的危险因素,包括年龄、颅脑损伤、休克指数、GCS评分、乳酸水平、就诊时间和ISS评分。这些结果为创伤患者的管理提供了重要参考,强调了针对高风险群体的早期干预和个性化治疗的重要性。未来研究应进一步探讨这些危险因素的具体机制,并寻求更有效的干预措施以降低创伤患者的死亡率。

关键词: 创伤和损伤;死亡率;危险因素; Meta分析

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the main risk factors affecting the death of trauma patients.
Methods The related literatures up to October 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, China Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang, HowNet and VIP databases were searched. CohORt study or case-control study of trauma patients aged ≥18 years were included, and literatures with no relevant data, such as reviews, case reports and case analysis, were excluded. Finally, 17 articles were included, with a total of 5909 patients. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of literature, and STATA 17.0 software was used for Meta-analysis.
Results Meta-analysis showed that the following factors significantly increased the risk of death of trauma patients: Age (≥60 years old, OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 2.28-5.24, P < 0.001), craniocerebral injury (OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.37-3.71, P = 0.001), shock index (> 1.0, 0.001). 95%CI: 1.96-66.37, P=0.007), lactic acid level (or = 1.43, 95% ci: 1.26-1.61, p = 0.000), and time of seeing a doctor (or = 3.58, 95% ci: 2.10-6.10). There was no significant correlation between mechanical ventilation and the death of trauma patients (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.69-1.88, P = 0.600).
Conclusion   This meta-analysis identified a number of risk factors that significantly affected the death of trauma patients, including age, craniocerebral injury, shock index, GCS score, lactic acid level, visit time and ISS score. These results provide an important reference for the management of trauma patients, and emphasize the importance of early intervention and personalized treatment for high-risk groups. Future research should further explore the specific mechanisms of these risk factors and seek more effective interventions to reduce the mortality of trauma patients.

Key words: Trauma and injury; Mortality rate; Risk factors; Meta analysis

参考文献 References

[1] Fried L P, Tangen C M, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2001,56(3):M146-M156.

[2] Drake S A, Holcomb J B, Yang Y, et al. Establishing a Regional Trauma Preventable/Potentially Preventable Death Rate[J]. Ann Surg, 2020,271(2):375-382.

[3] Kwon J, Lee M, Moon J, et al. National Follow-up Survey of Preventable Trauma Death Rate in Korea[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2022,37(50):e349.

[4] Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10258):1204-1222.

[5] Luchini C, Veronese N, Nottegar A, et al. Assessing the quality of studies in meta-research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools[J]. Pharm Stat, 2021, 20(1):185-195.

[6] 赵磊, 刘卓, 李卫. 急诊创伤患者死亡的相关因素与救治对策分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2021,6(03):16-18.

[7] 林琳, 刘尉, 王聪敏, 等. 急诊救治创伤患者死亡发生危险因素与急诊救治对策[J]. 华夏医学, 2018,31(02):22-25.

[8] 张旗, 李海山, 左爽. 多发伤患者死亡的危险因素分析[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2019,20(07):517-520.

[9] 薛花. 急诊多发伤患者致死的危险因素与急救措施分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2018,3(13):97-98.

[10] 王庚壮, 潘昭宇, 潘立峰. 急诊多发伤患者死亡的影响因素分析[J]. 天津医药, 2017,45(08):885-888.

[11] 张金良. 急诊外科创伤患者死亡危险因素及急救措施[J]. 中国科技期刊数据库医药, 2023(6):120-123.

[12] 伟琴, 余红艳. 急诊创伤患者临床特点及早期死亡的危险因素分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2023,28(06):1059-1062.

[13] 张金庆. 急诊创伤患者的临床特点及死亡相关因素分析[D]. 河北医科大学, 2021.

[14] 廖文, 谭浪. 急诊创伤患者临床特点及早期死亡的危险因素分析[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)医药卫生, 2023(11):66-68.

[15] 邓淑萍, 邱红, 王斌, 等. 重症创伤患者早期死亡危险因素分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2021,23(10):771-774.

[16] 苗振军, 蔡华忠, 魏法星, 等. 多发伤患者院内死亡危险因素分析[J]. 中国急救医学, 2018,38(5):410-413.

[17] 毛文杰, 席新华. 粤北区域医疗中心急性严重创伤患者早期死亡相关因素分析[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023,18(10):1327-1330.

[18] 苗振军, 张登奎, 梁亚鹏, 等. 多发伤患者院内死亡独立危险因素分析及预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2023,39(7):643-651.

[19] 李波, 皮高兴. 急诊外科创伤患者死亡危险因素及急救措施分析[J]. 中国社区医师, 2022,38(33):19-21.

[20] 赵继军. 急诊抢救室多发伤患者早期死亡危险因素分析[D]. 宁夏医科大学, 2021.

[21] Yadollahi M. A study of mortality risk factors among trauma referrals to trauma center,  Shiraz, Iran, 2017[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2019,22(4):212-218.

[22] Carne B, Raina A, Bothara R, et al. Factors contributing to death of major trauma victims with haemorrhage: A  retrospective case-control study[J]. Emerg Med Australas, 2023,35(6):968-975.

[23] 陈茜, 刘伯飞. 老年创伤患者临床特征和死亡危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2015,14(4):272-275.

[24] 田万管周宝林沈洪. 不同年龄组急诊严重创伤的临床特点分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2003(02).

[25] 刘华, 李兵, 阮海林, 等. 不同年龄段急性创伤患者的临床特征分析[J]. 广西医学, 2015,37(03):372-374.

[26] Aitken L M, Burmeister E, Lang J, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of injured older adults after hospital admission[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010,58(3):442-449.

[27] ark Y J, Ro Y S, Shin S D, et al. Age effects on case fatality rates of injury patients by mechanism[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2016,34(3):515-520.

[28] 郑细良, 张亮, 方治军, 等. 2017—2022年北京市大兴区人民医院创伤性脑损伤流行病学特征及早期死亡的预测因素[J]. 实用预防医学, 2024,31(04):471-475.

[29] Rady M Y, Smithline H A, Blake H, et al. A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 1994,24(4):685-690.

[30] Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Munzberg M, et al. The Shock Index revisited - a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A  retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU[J]. Crit Care, 2013,17(4):R172.

[31] Brill J B, Tang B, Hatton G, et al. Impact of Incorporating Whole Blood into Hemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation:  Analysis of 1,377 Consecutive Trauma Patients Receiving Emergency-Release  Uncrossmatched Blood Products[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2022,234(4):408-418.

[32] Kalkwarf K J, Cotton B A. Resuscitation for Hypovolemic Shock[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2017,97(6):1307-1321.

[33] Pusateri A E, Moore E E, Moore H B, et al. Association of Prehospital Plasma Transfusion With Survival in Trauma Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock When Transport Times Are Longer Than 20 Minutes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PAMPer and COMBAT Clinical Trials[J]. JAMA Surg, 2020, 155(2):e195085.

[34] James M F, Michell W L, Joubert I A, et al. Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate  clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial  (Fluids in Resuscitation of Severe Trauma)[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011,107(5):693-702.

[35] Contenti J, Occelli C, Corraze H, et al. Long-Term beta-Blocker Therapy Decreases Blood Lactate Concentration in Severely Septic Patients[J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43(12): 2616-2622.

[36] Trevino C, Geier T, Timmer-Murillo S C, et al. Feasibility of a trauma quality-of-life follow-up clinic[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020,89(1):226-229.

引用本文

邹立成, 高红, 何沙沙, 蒋丹丹, 江卫男, 影响成人创伤患者死亡率的因素-Meta分析[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2024; 6: (10) : 37-43.