To compare the effect of evidence-based nursing and routine nursing in radiotherapy of lung cancer patients
比较循证护理与常规护理在肺癌患者放疗中的作用

摘要

目的 探究并比较循证护理方法的实施与常规护理在针对肺癌患者放疗治疗中的护理效果差异情况。方法 通过选取80例来自我院2023年6月-2024年6月内诊治的采用放疗治疗的肺癌患者，根据随机抽签原则将患者分为两组，将其中实施常规护理的患者列为对照组（40名），其余患者的护理工作都采用了循证护理模式，列为观察组（40名）。对两组不同的护理方法下的预后效果进行记录和对比。结果 观察组患者的生活质量提升幅度更大（P＜0.05）。结论 循证护理方法的实施对于肺癌患者放疗治疗工作有着良好的辅助作用，该模式相较于常规护理方法能够更有效地降低患者治疗过程疼痛感，加速患者康复效果效率提升，进一步提升患者的生活质量水平，对于增强护理效果，提升护理质量有着更大的帮助，因此临床护理中应优先选择该护理模式进行护理。

Abstract

Objective To explore and compare the nursing effect difference between the implementation of evidence-based nursing and conventional nursing in the treatment of lung cancer patients with radiotherapy.
Methods A total of 80 lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in our hospital from June 2023 to June 2024 were selected and divided into two groups according to the principle of random drawing. The patients receiving routine care were classified as the control group (40 patients), and the other patients were classified as the observation group (40 patients) after adopting the evidence-based nursing mode. The prognostic effects of the two groups under different nursing methods were recorded and compared.
Results The quality of life in the observation group was improved significantly (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   The implementation of evidence-based nursing has a good auxiliary effect on the radiotherapy treatment of lung cancer patients. Compared with conventional nursing methods, this mode can more effectively reduce the pain of patients during treatment, accelerate the improvement of the rehabilitation efficiency of patients, further improve the quality of life of patients, and have greater help to enhance the nursing effect and improve the quality of nursing. Therefore, this nursing model should be preferred in clinical nursing.