Open Access Article
International Journal of Nursing Research. 2025; 7: (2) ; 83-85 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20250082.
Exploration into the improvement of perineal incision rate through unprotected perineal delivery in delivery room nursing practice
产房护理实践中应用无保护会阴接生对会阴切开率的改善探讨
作者:
张宏伟 *
贵州省人民医院 贵州贵阳
*通讯作者:
张宏伟,单位:贵州省人民医院 贵州贵阳;
发布时间: 2025-02-13 总浏览量: 33
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
目的 分析产房护理实践中应用无保护会阴接生对会阴切开率的改善效果和应用价值。方法 纳入我院2023年1月~2024年1月内正常分娩的产妇68例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(传统接生方式干预)和观察组(无保护会阴接生方式干预)各34例,对比两组应用效果。结果 观察组第一、二、三产程用时均显著短于对照组。且观察组产妇会阴侧切率、会阴切开率和不良反应总发生率均显著低于对照组,差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在产房护理实践中应用无保护会阴接生具有较好效果,能够显著缩短产妇产程用时,降低会阴侧切和会阴切开的发生,避免产妇产后出血和新生儿窒息,具有较高临床应用价值。
关键词: 产房护理;无保护会阴接生;会阴切开率
Abstract
Objective To analyze the improvement effect and application value of unprotected perineal delivery on perineal incision rate in delivery room nursing practice. Methods A total of 68 postpartum women who gave birth normally in our hospital between January 2023 and January 2024 were randomly divided into a control group (intervention with traditional delivery methods) and an observation group (intervention with unprotected perineal delivery methods), with 34 cases in each group. The application effects of the two groups were compared. Results The duration of the first, second, and third stages of labor in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group. The rates of perineal lateral incision, perineal incision, and total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of unprotected perineal delivery in delivery room nursing practice has a good effect, which can significantly shorten the duration of labor, reduce the occurrence of perineal lateral incision and perineal incision, avoid postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia, and has high clinical application value.
Key words: Maternity care; Unprotected perineal delivery; Perineal incision rate
参考文献 References
[1] 朱新如. 无保护会阴接生法联合自由体位对产妇自然分娩的影响[J]. 中国校医,2023,37(12):932-934,944.
[2] 杜滔萍. 全程助产护理对无保护会阴接生初产妇心理状态及产后疼痛的影响[J]. 医学信息,2021,34(z2):77-78.
[3] 杨丽霞,赫建波. 无保护会阴接生技术的应用[J]. 中国保健营养,2021,31(33):88.
[4] 林蕴华. 侧卧位分娩配合无保护会阴接生法的临床护理效果观察[J]. 医药前沿,2021,11(26):126-127.
[5] 马丽丽,张向鸽,晋佳乐. 自由体位联合无保护会阴接生在自然分娩中的应用效果[J]. 临床研究,2021,29(1):98-99.
[6] 邢玉凤,韦丽. 无保护会阴接生在产房护理中的应用研究[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2020,8(26):24,26.
[7] 帕提曼·祖农,孙俐红. 无保护会阴接生法与传统接生的临床比较研究[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2020,20(51):1-3.
[8] 黄拼. 无保护会阴接生在产房护理实践中的临床应用效果评估[J]. 医学美学美容,2020,29(10):105.
引用本文
张宏伟, 产房护理实践中应用无保护会阴接生对会阴切开率的改善探讨[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2025; 7: (2) : 83-85.