摘要
目的 分析无缝衔接一体化急救护理用于急诊脑卒中的价值。方法 随机均分2023年6月-2024年5月本院急诊科接诊脑卒中病人（n=80）。试验组采取无缝衔接一体化急救护理，对照组行常规护理。对比FMA评分等指标。结果 关于会诊时间和转科时间与抢救时间：试验组短于对照组（P＜0.05）。FMA和MHSS评分：干预后，试验组（79.34±3.62）分、（13.11±2.83）分，对照组（68.51±4.03）分、（16.64±3.02）分，差异显著（P＜0.05）。护理质量：试验组高达（98.02±0.91）分，对照组只有（92.23±1.36）分，差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论 急诊脑卒中用无缝衔接诶一体化急救护理，病人的护理质量更好，急救效率更高，运动功能改善也更加显著，神经功能恢复速度更快。
关键词： 脑卒中；运动功能；无缝衔接一体化急救护理；会诊时间
Abstract
Objective To analyze the value of seamless integrated emergency care for emergency stroke. Methods Stroke patients admitted to the emergency department of our hospital from June 2023 to May 2024 were randomly divided into two groups (n=80). The experimental group received seamless integrated emergency care, and the control group received routine care. FMA scores and other indicators were compared. Results Regarding consultation time, transfer time and rescue time: the experimental group was shorter than the control group (P＜0.05). FMA and MHSS scores: after intervention, the experimental group (79.34±3.62) points, (13.11±2.83) points, the control group (68.51±4.03) points, (16.64±3.02) points, the difference was significant (P＜0.05). Nursing quality: The experimental group scored as high as (98.02±0.91) points, while the control group scored only (92.23±1.36) points, with a significant difference (P＜0.05). Conclusion Emergency stroke patients use seamless integrated emergency care, which can improve the nursing quality, improve the emergency efficiency, improve the motor function, and recover the neurological function faster.
Key words： Stroke; Motor function; Seamless integrated emergency care; Consultation time
参考文献 References
[1] 陈林珠. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者实施尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗院内一体化急救护理模式的效果评价[J]. 医药前沿,2020,10(4):174-175.
[2] 张春香. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓患者应用院内一体化急救护理模式的效果分析[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2024,9(8):150-153.
[3] JUHI DESAI, MARWA ISMAIL, CHINENYE IBEKWE, et al. Structural deformation radiomic features to identify associations between brain regions and verbal fluency scores in acute stroke patients: preliminary findings[C]//Medical Imaging 2024: Computer-Aided Diagnosis: At SPIE Medical Imaging.19-22 February 2024.San Diego, California, United States. 2024:129271D.1-129271D.5.
[4] 卓梅娟,陈淑琴,李静菡,等. 优化急性脑卒中绿色通道流程院内一体化无缝衔接急救管理模式的应用研究[J]. 循证护理,2023,9(4):758-760.
[5] 于敢红,李慧敏,张海红. 以控制溶栓时间为基础的院内一体化急救护理在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(13):81-83.
[6] 张君. 探讨院内一体化急救护理干预模式对急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓患者的影响[J]. 中外女性健康研究,2022, 27(24):168-169.
[7] SPENCER H. WELLAND, GRACE HYUN J. KIM, ANIL YADAV, et al. Assessing variability in non-contrast CT for the evaluation of stroke: The effect of CT image reconstruction conditions on AI-based CAD measurements of ASPECTS value and hypodense volume[C]//Medical Imaging 2024: Computer-Aided Diagnosis: At SPIE Medical Imaging.19-22 February 2024.San Diego, California, United States. 2024:1292711.1-1292711.7.
[8] 李霞. 院前院内一体化急救护理对出血性脑卒中患者临床疗效影响分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2021,32(2):321-323.
[9] 李凤嫔. 无缝衔接一体化急救护理模式对提升缺血性脑卒中患者救护质量的效果分析[J]. 健康之家,2023,14(11): 162-164.
[10] 刘勤,黄桂先. 无缝衔接一体化急救护理对急诊脑卒中患者神经功能及运动功能的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理（中英文）,2024,10(3):154-156.
[11] 冯晓英,曾思婷. 急诊脑卒中患者应用无缝衔接一体化急救护理模式的效果[J]. 妇女之友,2024,16(3):106-107.