Application and effect evaluation of evidence-based nursing in neonatal pneumonia nursing
循证护理在新生儿肺炎护理中的应用及效果评价

摘要

目的 将循证护理用于新生儿肺炎（NP）中，对其应用及效果进行评价。方法 选取2023年1月~2024年1月本院收治的50例NP患儿作为对照组，行常规护理，选取2024年2月~2025年2月本院收治的50例NP患儿作为观察组，行循证护理，比较两组血气分析指标、肺功能指标及不良事件发生率差异。结果 干预前，两组SpO2、PaCO2、PaO2水平相比无显著差异（P>0.05），干预后，两组各血气分析指标均有所改善，观察组SpO2与PaO2水平更高、PaCO2水平更低（P<0.05）；治疗前，两组PEF、FVC、FEV1水平相比，无显著差异（P>0.05），干预后，观察组各水平更高（P<0.05）；两组不良事件发生率比较，观察组4.00%更低（P<0.05）。结论 对NP患儿而言，实施循证护理可较高改善患儿血气分析及肺功能指标，还可减少不良事件发生，值得推广。

Abstract

Objective To apply evidence - based nursing in neonatal pneumonia (NP) and evaluate its application and effect.
Methods Fifty NP children admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to January 2024 were selected as the control group and received routine nursing. Fifty NP children admitted to our hospital from February 2024 to February 2025 were selected as the observation group and received evidence - based nursing. The differences in blood gas analysis indexes, pulmonary function indexes and the incidence of adverse events between the two groups were compared.
Results Before the intervention, there were no significant differences in the levels of SpO2, PaCO2 and PaO2 between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, the blood gas analysis indexes of both groups were improved. The levels of SpO2 and PaO2 in the observation group were higher, and the level of PaCO2 was lower (P<0.05). Before the treatment, there were no significant differences in the levels of PEF, FVC and FEV1 between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, the levels in the observation group were higher (P<0.05). In terms of the comparison of the incidence of adverse events between the two groups, 4.00% in the observation group was lower (P<0.05).
Conclusion   For NP children, the implementation of evidence - based nursing can significantly improve the blood gas analysis and pulmonary function indexes of children, and can also reduce the occurrence of adverse events, which is worthy of promotion.