CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2025; 7: (10) ; 85-88 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20250531.

A specific analysis of the comparative application of the severe illness nursing scoring system and graded nursing in the care of severe traumatic brain injury
重症护理评分系统与分级护理在重度颅脑损伤护理中的应用比较具体分析

作者: 马雪珍 *

新疆医科大学第一附属医院 新疆乌鲁木齐

*通讯作者: 马雪珍,单位:新疆医科大学第一附属医院 新疆乌鲁木齐;

发布时间: 2025-10-26 总浏览量: 172

摘要

目的 针对重度颅脑损伤患者,比较重症护理评分系统与分级护理的效果。方法 2024年1月-2025年1月,选择重度颅脑损伤患者,共计119例,信封法用以区分组别,施以分级护理合计59例,视为参比组;施以重症护理评分系统护理合计60例,视为研究组,对比两组临床指标、并发症发生率、满意度。结果 研究组直接护理时间、留管时间、住院时间短于参比组,P<0.05。并发症发生率相比,研究组低于参比组,P<0.05。满意度在研究组高于参比组,P<0.05。结论 在重度颅脑损伤护理中,通过应用重症护理评分系统,能够改善患者临床指标,有效控制并发症的出现,且患者满意度高。

关键词: 重度颅脑损伤;分级护理;重症护理评分系统

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of the Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System and graded nursing for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Methods From January 2024 to January 2025, a total of 119 patients with severe traumatic brain injury were selected. The envelope method was used to differentiate groups, with 59 patients receiving graded nursing as the reference group, and 60 patients receiving nursing based on the Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System as the study group. Clinical indicators, complication rates, and satisfaction levels were compared between the two groups.
Results The direct nursing time, catheter retention time, and length of hospital stay in the study group were shorter than those in the reference group, P < 0.05. The complication rate in the study group was lower than that in the reference group, P < 0.05. Satisfaction in the study group was higher than that in the reference group, P < 0.05.
Conclusion   The application of the Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System in nursing for severe traumatic brain injury can improve patients' clinical indicators, effectively control the occurrence of complications, and achieve high patient satisfaction.

Key words: Severe traumatic brain injury; Graded nursing; Intensive care nursing scoring system

参考文献 References

[1] 刘悦. 重症护理评分系统分级护理在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用价值[J]. 中外医药研究,2025,4(11):106-108.

[2] 黄燕华,黄燕玲,黄金治. 重症颅脑外伤分层分级护理干预对患者的症状改善及睡眠质量影响[J]. 世界睡眠医学杂志,2024,11(2):389-391,395. 

[3] 邵冰. 重症护理评分系统与分级护理在重度颅脑损伤患者护理中的应用分析[J]. 中国社区医师,2022(29): 140-142.

[4] 白亚蓓,赵印,胡冬冬,等. 基于快速反应团队模式的分级护理在颅脑损伤患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2024, 30(1):108-111. 

[5] 冯芳,叶保梅,詹勇慧. 分级护理干预对ICU颅脑损伤患者病情恢复的影响[J]. 抗感染药学,2024,21(5):494-497. 

[6] 陈光临,孙益伟,王卫华,等. 护理目标管理策略结合早期分级康复训练对颅脑损伤后机械通气患者肌力及康复情况的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2024,9(30):122-125. 

[7] 陈若,蒋蕾. 分级监控管理+全面护理在预防颅脑损伤术后下肢深静脉血栓中的应用[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2023, 42(9):1700-1703. 

[8] 赵翔,李付华,吕会力,等. 护士主导的早期分级活动方案在重度颅脑损伤术后患者中的应用[J]. 河南外科学杂志,2025,31(3):181-184.

[9] 徐瑶. 分级监控管理联合责任制整体护理重症颅脑损伤术后患者的效果[J]. 中国药物经济学,2023,18(4): 125-128. 

[10] 刘沛,李丹,李晓旭. 分级监控管理联合精细化护理在重症颅脑损伤患者护理中的应用效果[J]. 保健医学研究与实践,2022,19(1):134-137.

引用本文

马雪珍, 重症护理评分系统与分级护理在重度颅脑损伤护理中的应用比较具体分析[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2025; 7: (10) : 85-88.