CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2026; 8: (3) ; 143-145 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20260151.

Study on the combined use of two non pharmacological labor analgesia methods and their impact on the labor process
2种非药物性分娩镇痛方法的联合运用对产程的影响研究

作者: 高晶晶 *

盐城市亭湖区人民医院 江苏盐城

*通讯作者: 高晶晶,单位:盐城市亭湖区人民医院 江苏盐城;

发布时间: 2026-03-21 总浏览量: 30

摘要

目的 探究分析2种非药物性分娩镇痛方法的联合运用对产程的影响。方法 选取2024年1月至2025年1月期间,院内62例初产妇作为此次研究对象。通过随机数表法,将62例初产妇随机分为对照组与观察组。对照组采用常规分娩,观察组采用2种非药物性分娩镇痛方法。对比两组疼痛程度及产程时间。结果 观察组出现规律宫缩时、宫口开3cm时及宫口全开时VAS评分均低于对照组,P<0.05。观察第一、二、三产程时间均低于对照组,P<0.05。结论 2种非药物性分娩镇痛方法的联合运用可显著降低产妇疼痛程度,同时可进一步缩短产程时间,值得推广与应用。

关键词: 非药物性分娩镇痛;疼痛程度;产程时间

Abstract

Objective To explore and analyze the combined use of two non pharmacological labor analgesia methods and their impact on the labor process.
Methods 62 primiparous women in the hospital from January 2024 to January 2025 were selected as the study subjects. 62 primiparous women were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group using a random number table method. The control group received conventional delivery, while the observation group received two non pharmacological delivery analgesia methods. Compare the degree of pain and duration of labor between two groups. The VAS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group when regular contractions occurred, when the cervix was opened 3cm, and when the cervix was fully opened, P<0.05. Observing that the duration of the first, second, and third stages of labor was lower than that of the control group, P<0.05.
Conclusion   The combined use of two non pharmacological methods for labor analgesia can significantly reduce the degree of pain in parturients and further shorten the duration of labor, which is worthy of promotion and application.

Key words: Non pharmacological labor analgesia; Pain level; Production time

参考文献 References

[1] 周丽萍. 聚焦解决护理干预模式对非药物性分娩镇痛产妇的负性情绪、镇痛效果以及自我护理能力的影响[J].全科护理,2019,17(14):1751-1753.

[2] 涂友兰,谢丽晶,曾春连,等. 聚焦解决模式用于非药物性分娩镇痛产妇健康教育中的价值评价[J].黑龙江中医药,2022,51(05):120-122.

[3] 王晓娇,顾春怡,张铮,等.非药物性分娩镇痛在阴道试产产妇产程管理中的最佳证据总结[C]//上海市护理学会.第五届上海国际护理大会论文摘要汇编(下).复旦大学附属妇产科医院;,2022:263-264.

[4] 陈娟. 家庭化产房陪伴导乐服务联合药物性分娩镇痛对自然分娩产妇的影响[J].医药高职教育与现代护理,2022,5(05):412-415.

[5] 华婕. 聚焦解决模式在非药物性分娩镇痛产妇健康教育中的应用效果[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2022,29(08):26-29.

[6] 张静,高丽娟,金环. 一对一导乐陪伴联合非药物分娩镇痛在自然分娩产妇中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021, 27(18):139-141.

[7] 郝立影,高学军,王欣,等. 基于聚焦解决模式的健康教育用于初产妇非药物性分娩镇痛效果[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2025,33(01):145-148+154.

[8] 吴丽娟. 非药物分娩镇痛仪联合导乐分娩促进自然分娩的临床研究[J].人人健康,2020,(11):33+32.

[9] 何晓婷.基于循证构建助产士主导的非药物性分娩镇痛干预方案及应用研究[D].右江民族医学院,2023.

[10] 王晓娇,顾春怡,张铮,等. 非药物性分娩镇痛在阴道试产产妇产程管理中的证据总结[J].中华护理杂志,2021, 56(07):1086-1092.

引用本文

高晶晶, 2种非药物性分娩镇痛方法的联合运用对产程的影响研究[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2026; 8: (3) : 143-145.