Evaluation of the effect of clinical nursing pathway research on anesthesia recovery period in patients after general anesthesia surgery
临床护理路径研究全身麻醉术后患者麻醉恢复期的效果评价

摘要

目的 探讨临床护理路径研究全身麻醉术后患者麻醉恢复期的效果。方法 本次研究共计选择了52例患者作为研究对象，所有患者均为全身麻醉后恢复期患者，且均源自本医院，时间节点在2024年2月至2025年2月期间，研究采取对照形式，因此需要将患者进行平均分组，分组使用随机数字表法，即26例患者为对照组行常规护理模式，另26例患者采用临床护理路径，以此比较两种不同护理模式下患者的各项指标变化情况。结果 观察组患者的恢复质量更佳，证实临床护理路径的有效性（P＜0.05）；采用临床护理能够有效降低观察组患者不良反应发生率（P＜0.05）；观察组患者认为临床护理路径各环节专业且体验感较好（P＜0.05）。结论 临床护理路径研究全身麻醉术后患者麻醉恢复期的效果显著，患者的恢复质量较好，且患者不良反应发生率呈现下降趋势，对临床护理路径的认可度较高，值得临床推广。

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of clinical nursing pathway on the recovery period of anesthesia in patients after general anesthesia.
Methods A total of 52 patients were selected as the research subjects in this study. All patients were in the recovery period after general anesthesia and came from our hospital. The time period was from February 2024 to February 2025. The study was conducted in a controlled form, so patients were divided into two groups using a random number table method. The control group consisted of 26 patients who received routine nursing care, while the other 26 patients received clinical nursing pathway. The changes in various indicators of patients under the two different nursing modes were compared.
Results The recovery quality of the observation group patients was better, confirming the effectiveness of the clinical nursing pathway (P<0.05); The use of clinical nursing can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group patients (P<0.05); The observation group patients believed that each link of the clinical nursing pathway was professional and had a good sense of experience (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The study of clinical nursing pathway has a significant effect on the recovery period of patients after general anesthesia, with good recovery quality and a decreasing incidence of adverse reactions. The recognition of clinical nursing pathway is high and worthy of clinical promotion.