欢迎来到OAJRC平台！

核心 CSCIED

期刊栏目

投稿

审稿

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据：

当前位置：国际护理学研究 > 2026年 8卷 (9)期

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2026; 8: (9) ; 53-60 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20260459.

The mediating role of social support between stigma and quality of life among caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder
社会支持在孤独症儿童主要照顾者连带病耻感与生活质量间的中介作用

作者： 潘胜茂 *, 肖涵, 温李滔

广东食品药品职业学院护理学院广东广州

*通讯作者：潘胜茂,单位：广东食品药品职业学院护理学院广东广州；

广东省医学科研基金立项项目（A2024683）广东食品药品职业学院科研项目（2023RW04）

发布时间: 2026-09-06 总浏览量: 54 下载量: 加载中...

PDF 全文下载引用本文

摘要

目的探讨孤独症儿童主要照顾者连带病耻感对生活质量的影响及社会支持的中介作用。方法采用方便抽样法选取广州2家康复机构181名孤独症儿童主要照顾者为研究对象，运用一般资料调查表、连带病耻感量表（ASS）、社会支持量表（SSRS）和世界卫生组织生命质量测定量表简表（W HOQOL-BREF）进行调查。结果孤独症儿童主要照顾者ASS得分为（48.58±10.43）分，存在中等偏上的连带病耻感，WHOQOL-BREF得分为（77.83±12.81）分，处于中等水平；照顾者SSRS得分为（35.24±5.07）分，为中等水平。Pearson相关分析结果显示，照顾者连带病耻感与生活质量呈负相关（r=-0.525，P<0.01），与社会支持呈负相关（r=-0.176，P<0.05）。社会支持与生活质量呈正相关（r=0.221，P<0.01），中介效应分析表明，社会支持是照顾者连带病耻感与生活质量的中介变量，总效应值为-0.5006，直接效应值为-0.4625，中介效应值为-0.0381，中介效应占总效应的7.61%。结论孤独症儿童主要照顾者的连带病耻感会对其生活质量产生影响，社会支持在这一影响过程中起中介作用。医务人员应重视社会支持系统的构建，通过提供针对性的支持措施，缓解照顾者的连带病耻感，进而提升其生活质量。

关键词： 孤独症儿童照顾者；连带病耻感；社会支持；生活质量

Abstract

Objective To explore the influence of associated stigma on quality of life among primary caregivers of children with autism and the mediation effect of social support in this relationship.
Methods A total of 181 primary caregivers of children with autism from a rehabilitation institution in Guangzhou were selected using convenient sampling. They were surveyed using a general information questionnaire, the Associated Stigma Scale (ASS), the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF).
Results The average ASS score of the primary caregivers was (48.58±10.43), indicating a moderately high level of associated stigma. The average WHOQOL-BREF score of the caregivers was (77.83±12.81), which was at a moderate level. The average SSRS score of the caregivers was (35.24±5.07). Pearson correlation analysis showed that caregivers’ associated stigma was negatively correlated with quality of life (r=-0.525, P<0.01) and social support (r=-0.176, P<0.05). Social support was positively correlated with quality of life (r=0.221, P<0.01). Social support played a mediating role in the relationship between associated stigma and quality of life, with a total effect value of -0.5006, a direct effect value of -0.4625, a mediating effect value of -0.0381, and the mediating effect accounting for 7.61% of the total effect.
Conclusion Associated stigma among primary caregivers of children with autism affects their quality of life, and social support plays a mediating role in this process. Medical staff should attach importance to the construction of social support systems and provide targeted support measures to alleviate caregivers’ associated stigma and thereby improve their quality of life.

Key words： Caregivers of children with autism; Associated stigma; Social support; Quality of life

参考文献 References

[1] 中华医学会精神病学分会. 中国孤独症谱系障碍防治指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.

[2] 李雪, 王华丽. 孤独症儿童主要照顾者负担及影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(12): 1457-1462.

[3] Rusch N, Angermeyer MC, Corrigan PW. Mental illness stigma: concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma[J]. European Psychiatry, 2005, 20(8): 529-539.

[4] Diemer MC, Gerstein ED, Register A. Autism presentation in female and Black populations: Examining the roles of identity, theory, and systemic inequalities[J]. Autism, 2022, 26(8): 1931-1946.

[5] Breitbart S, Yan H, Mithani K, et al. Experiences of caregivers of children with severe self-injurious behavior: An interpretive, descriptive study[J]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2024, 67(6): 779-787.

[6] Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1985, 98(2): 310-357.

[7] Kim JH, Cheon SB, Yoo HJ, et al. Social support as a moderator of the relationship between caregiving burden and depression in family caregivers of adults with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2016, 46(9): 3024-3034.

[8] Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group[J]. Quality of Life Research, 2004, 13(2): 299-310.

[9] 史明丽, 彭炜, 方积乾, 等. 模糊综合评价法在社区人群生存质量评价中的应用——广东省五个地区生存质量的模糊综合评价[J]. 中国卫生统计, 1997, 15(4): 30-32.

[10] Mak W, Kwok Y. Internalization of stigma for parents of children with autism spectrum disorder in Hong Kong[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2010, 70(12): 2045-2051.

[11] 尹群明, 陈燕红, 陈玥, 等. 中文版连带内化污名量表在自闭症患儿父母中的修订[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29(2): 370-374.

[12] 肖水源. “社会支持评定量表”的理论基础与研究应用[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 1994, 4(2): 98-100.

[13] 戚亚敏. 连带病耻感对孤独症儿童主要照顾者生活质量的影响及中介效应分析[D]. 新乡: 新乡医学院, 2022.

[14] 吴淑琼, 李真真, 杨宁波, 等. 学龄前孤独症患儿照顾者连带病耻感及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(11): 88-91.

[15] 文丽丽, 成柳, 李绿容, 等. 孤独症患儿主要照顾者连带病耻感现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 临床护理杂志, 2022, 21(1): 48-51.

[16] 张艳, 李红, 王静. 孤独症患儿照顾者连带病耻感与社会支持的相关性研究[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(18): 3321-3325.

[17] 李娟, 王艳, 刘敏. 孤独症患儿照顾者连带病耻感的形成机制及干预研究进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2022, 28(30): 4195-4200.

[18] 赵谷娜, 赵晓莉, 贾甜, 等. 孤独症儿童的家庭结构、经济和地域的独特性研究[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2017, 14(19): 2959-2962.

[19] 陈洁, 刘红, 张莉. 孤独症儿童照顾者社会支持与生活质量的相关性分析[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2021, 37(27): 2121-2126.

[20] Swaab L, Goodwin J, Wroe J, et al. Stigma associated with parenting an autistic child with aggressive behaviour: a systematic review[J]. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2023, 10(2): 281-294.

[21] 张敏, 刘哲宁. 社会支持对孤独症儿童母亲生活质量的影响[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2018, 32(5): 361-365.

[22] 魏华, 刘永芳, 刘娟, 等. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童母亲生活质量及影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2018, 35(12): 934-937.

引用本文

潘胜茂, 肖涵, 温李滔, 社会支持在孤独症儿童主要照顾者连带病耻感与生活质量间的中介作用[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2026; 8: (9) : 53-60.

入驻平台

回到顶部

搜索文章: