CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2026; 8: (9) ; 153-161 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20260489.

Application report of NBAS-APS mode nursing combined with exclusive midwifery to improve pain free delivery experience
NBAS-APS模式护理联合专属助产对改善无痛分娩体验的应用报告

作者: 马爱娟, 朱丽红, 余柳琼 *

云南新昆华医院麻醉手术室 云南昆明

*通讯作者: 余柳琼,单位:云南新昆华医院麻醉手术室 云南昆明 ;

发布时间: 2026-09-30 总浏览量: 31 下载量: 加载中...

摘要

目的 探讨以麻醉护士主导,以麻醉医师为督导的疼痛管理模式(NBAS-APS)联合专属助产士对无痛分娩体验改善的应用价值。方法 选择我院采用无痛分娩的初产妇144例,按照随机原则分为观察组78例和对照组各66例,两组基线资料一致。对照组予以病区护士联合专属助产士为基础的常规急性疼痛的护理模式,观察组采用由麻醉护士主导参与的,以麻醉医生为督导的急性疼痛服务护理模式(NBAS-APS)。对比分析两组不同时间段产妇疼痛程度、分娩体验、焦虑抑郁水平及产后恢复情况。结果 观察组的分娩体验评分显著高于对照组,除麻醉门诊外其它时段的疼痛程度显著低于对照组,产后恢复情况显著优于对照组,观察组分娩体验问卷(CEQ)总分显著高于对照组(95.24±6.95 vs 82.96±5.17,P<0.001)。观察组在宫口开大3 cm、宫口全开及胎儿娩出时的疼痛评分(VAS)均显著低于对照组(P<0.001)。在宫口开大3 cm及产后2 h,观察组的汉密尔顿焦虑(HAMA)及抑郁(HAMD)量表评分亦显著低于对照组(P<0.001)。此外,观察组产后2 h出血量更少,首次下床、排尿及哺乳时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 通过麻醉护士主导,麻醉师督导协助的NBAS-APS模式联合专属助产的多学科协作可以显著改善无痛分娩产妇的分娩体验,有效提升产妇对分娩过程的控制感和满意度,促进产后快速康复,值得推广。

关键词: 麻醉护士;无痛分娩;专属助产士;产程镇痛;NBAS-APS护理模式

Abstract

Objective To explore the application value of the pain management model led by anesthesia nurses and supervised by anesthesiologists (NBAS-APS) combined with dedicated midwives in improving the experience of painless delivery.
Methods 144 primiparous women who underwent painless delivery in our hospital were randomly divided into an observation group of 78 cases and a control group of 66 cases each. The baseline data of the two groups were consistent. The control group received routine acute pain nursing based on ward nurses and dedicated midwives, while the observation group received acute pain service nursing led by anesthesia nurses and supervised by anesthesiologists (NBAS APS). Compare and analyze the pain level, delivery experience, anxiety and depression levels, and postpartum recovery of two groups of parturients at different time periods.
Results The delivery experience score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the pain level during other periods except for anesthesia clinic was significantly lower than that of the control group. The postpartum recovery was significantly better than that of the control group. The total score of the delivery experience questionnaire (CEQ) in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (95.24 ± 6.95 vs 82.96 ± 5.17, P<0.001). The pain scores (VAS) of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group when the cervix was widened by 3 cm, fully opened, and the fetus was delivered (P<0.001). The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Depression Scale (HAMD) scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group when the cervix was dilated by 3 cm and 2 hours postpartum (P<0.001). In addition, the observation group had less bleeding after 2 hours postpartum, and the first time getting out of bed, urinating, and breastfeeding were significantly shorter than the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The NBAS-APS model, led by anesthesia nurses and assisted by anesthesiologists, combined with specialized midwifery, can significantly improve the delivery experience of painless mothers, effectively enhance their sense of control and satisfaction with the delivery process, promote rapid postpartum recovery, and is worthy of promotion.

Key words: Anesthesia nurse; Painless delivery; Exclusive midwife; Pain relief during labor; NBAS-APS nursing model

参考文献 References

[1] 卢壁娴,龚艳艳.待产妇硬膜外分娩镇痛健康教育需求的调查分析[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(5):81-84.

[2] 朱淑榕,魏碧蓉,郭胜斌,等.硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷的研制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(9):1318-1324.

[3] 韩万凤,王敏,汪志敏.综合评分法在判断胎盘功能中的应用[J].山东医药,2006,46(9):58.

[4] 袁亚苹,侯丽莉,魏娇娇,等.硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇门诊行互动式健康教育的价值观察[J].基层医学论坛,2024,28(15):17-19.

[5] 王庆朝.不同浓度舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因硬膜外阻滞在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果[J].中国民康医学,2025,24(37):70-73.

[6] 王立维,管蓬兰,翟伟杰,等.多模式心理调适联合专属助产对无痛分娩产妇体验的改善效果[J].吉林医学,2025, 46(9):2275-2278.

[7] 戚芳,黄绍强,闵辉,等.椎管内分娩镇痛护理循证实践方案的构建[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(4):21-25.

[8] 张瑶,袁红梅,秦香,等.不同饮食对低风险产妇硬膜外分娩镇痛及胃排空时间的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2021, 37(9):937-940.

[9] DenckerA,BergM,BergqvistL,etal.DevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheChildbirthExperienceQuestionnaire(CEQ)[J].BMCPregnancyChildbirth,2010,10:81.

[10] HuskissonEC.Measurementofpain[J].Lancet,1974,2(7889):1127-1131.

[11] Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating[J]. Br J Med Psychol, 1959, 32(1):50-55.

[12] Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1960, 23:56-62.

[13] 熊丽.多模式分层心理护理联合健康行为干预对腰部麻醉无痛分娩初产妇心理状态应激反应的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2024,28(8):122-125.

[14] 韩小娟.多模式分层心理护理在初产妇无痛分娩中的应用效果观察[J].婚育与健康,2023,29(12):103-105.

[15] 黎金玲.剖宫产术后疼痛护理干预及研究进展[J].当代临床医刊,2016,29(3):2301-2302.

[16] 钟善琼,苟菊香,周倩.甲状腺病人术后疼痛的相关因素分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2018,24(11):866-871.

[17] EISENACHJC,PANPH,SMILEYR,etal,Severityofacutepainafterchildbirth,butnottypeofdelivery,predictspersistentpainandpostpartumdepression[J].Pain,2008,140(1):87-94.

[18] 相世霞,魏霞,李霞.瘢痕子宫再次剖宫产临床观察与护理[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(14):238-239.

[19] 庄列萍,吴群,杜忠举.NBAS-APS疼痛管理模式用于肩袖损伤修补术患者围手术期的临床效果观察[J].中国现代医生,2022,60(31):99-103.

[20] 王戈.麻醉科护士岗位胜任力现状及影响因素研究[C].沈阳,辽宁中医药大学,2020.

[21] 王秀丽,张妍,何苗.麻醉科护士在多学科疼痛管理中的作用[J].麻醉安全与质控,2021,5(5):301-305.

[22] 胡秀英,刘倩,刘丽.“护理+”多学科交叉融合发展的“前世今生”与未来[J].中华现代护理杂志,2023,29(4):421-426.

[23] 陈俊丞,黎志华,李冰.不同剂量舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果观察[J].北方药学,2025,22(08):83-84+90.

[24] 代景秋,左宪丽,李光亮.舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果[J].中国民康医学,2024,36(03):91-93.

[25] 曹阳,贾云霄,谭育松.改良新产程模式管理硬膜外麻醉无痛分娩产程对母婴结局的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(01):24-26.

[26] 史纪元,刘倩,韦帅芳,等.护理临床实践指南面临的机遇与挑战[J].协和医学杂志,2022,13(4):719-725..

[27] 张敏妍,张亚静.瘢痕子宫再次剖宫产的临床观察与护理方法研究[J].临床合理用药杂志,2016,9(17):135-136.

[28] 胡广尤,王莉,汪艳.多模式分层心理护理结合疼痛护理在无痛分娩产妇中的应用[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2023,9(03):73-75.

引用本文

马爱娟, 朱丽红, 余柳琼, NBAS-APS模式护理联合专属助产对改善无痛分娩体验的应用报告[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2026; 8: (9) : 153-161.