CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2026; 8: (9) ; 124-126 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20260480.

Analysis of the efficacy of collaborative intervention on labor process using intra-delivery ultrasound monitoring and midwifery care in primiparous women
初产妇产时超声监测与助产护理协同干预产程的疗效分析

作者: 祁清 *, 曾梅

普洱市人民医院 云南普洱

*通讯作者: 祁清,单位:普洱市人民医院 云南普洱 ;

发布时间: 2026-09-30 总浏览量: 87 下载量: 加载中...

摘要

目的 通过回顾性分析,探究初产妇产时超声监测与助产护理协同干预产程的效果。方法 回顾性分析2025年1月至2025年8月期间,院内80例初产妇病案资料。2025年1月至2025年4月的40例初产妇接受常规阴道指检联合常规护理,作为对照组。2025年5月至2025年8月的40例初产妇接受产时超声监测与助产护理,作为观察组。对比两组分娩结果及产程时间。结果 观察组自然分娩率高于对照组,P<0.05。观察组产程时间低于对照组,P<0.05。结论 产时超声监测与助产护理可显著改善初产妇分娩结果及产程时间,值得推广与应用。

关键词: 初产妇;产时超声;助产护理;分娩结果;产程时间

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of collaborative intervention with intrapartum ultrasound monitoring and obstetric care on the labor process in primiparous women through retrospective analysis.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 80 primiparous women hospitalized between January 2025 and August 2025. The first 40 cases (January to April 2025) received routine vaginal examinations combined with standard care as the control group. The latter 40 cases (May to August 2025) underwent intrapartum ultrasound monitoring and obstetric care as the observation group. The delivery outcomes and labor durations were compared between the two groups.
Results The natural delivery rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The labor duration in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   Intrapartum ultrasound monitoring and obstetric care can significantly improve delivery outcomes and labor duration in primiparous women, making it worthy of promotion and application.

Key words: Primipara; Intrapartum ultrasound; Midwifery care; Delivery outcomes; Labor duration

参考文献 References

[1] 向雪雯,刘春花,牟莎莎,等. 产时超声监测胎心及胎方位结合新产程图产程管理对产妇分娩方式及妊娠结局影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2024, 32(5): 1081-1085.

[2] 魏婧,董晓超,刘蓉,等. 产时超声在第二产程延长中对分娩方式的指导及对母婴结局的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(14): 1798-1803.

[3] 吉珂萌,李志珍,赵缨,等. 无法忍受不确定性对初产妇分娩恐惧的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2023, 54(4): 837-842.

[4] 张译文,何银芳. 分娩恐惧对单胎初产妇妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国生育健康杂志,2024,35(5):424-429.

[5] 杨元元,孙丹华,嵇萍. 分娩潜伏期AOP、HPD与初产妇产程时长的关系及对分娩方式的预测价值[J]. 中南医学科学杂志,2024,52(3):474-476.

[6] 彭坤航.AOP与HPD在初产妇中监测产程进展和预测分娩结局的可行性分析[D]. 遵义医科大学,2023.

[7] 谢慧君, 钟春华. 经腹部联合会阴超声检查在产程观察中的临床价值分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2024, 30(22): 119-121.

[8] 陈晓霞,胡琼. 会阴超声参数在第一产程中对初产妇阴道分娩的预测价值[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2020,36(10):773-776.

引用本文

祁清, 曾梅, 初产妇产时超声监测与助产护理协同干预产程的疗效分析[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2026; 8: (9) : 124-126.