Evaluation of the effect of evidence-based nursing on improving the nursing needs of patients with external urethral drainage and internal stent drainage after urological surgery
循证护理对改善泌尿外科术后输尿管外引流与内支架管内引流患者护理需求的效果评价

摘要

目的：分析循证护理对改善泌尿外科术后输尿管外引流与内支架管内引流患者护理需求的应用效果。方法：本次对照实验中，将于我院泌尿外科接受手术治疗的72例患者作为研究对象，在入组后采用随机数表法将患者随机分配为参照组和研究组，每组36例患者，并使用不同的护理方式，其中研究组使用循证护理，参照组则使用常规护理，在护理后对比患者的护理需求。结果：使用输尿管外引流的患者与使用内支架管内引流的患者之间护理需求无较大差异，同时，两组患者在护理前，其相关知识指导、心理不良情绪、社会支持等护理需求无较大差异，但在护理后，使用循证护理的研究组，护理效果更佳，且数据间有明显统计学意义，（P＜0.05）。结论：在泌尿外科术后不同引流患者的护理需求满足方面使用循证护理更好，可使患者进一步了解相关健康知识，并改善其心理状态。

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effect of evidence-based nursing on improving the nursing needs of patients with external urethral drainage and internal stent drainage after urological surgery.
Methods: In this controlled experiment, 72 patients undergoing surgical treatment in our hospital's urology department will be taken as the research object. After enrollment, the patients will be randomly assigned to the reference group and the study group, with 36 patients in each group. And use different nursing methods, in which the research group uses evidence-based nursing, the reference group uses conventional nursing, and the nursing needs of patients are compared after nursing.
Results: There was no significant difference in the nursing needs between patients using external urethral drainage and those using internal stent drainage. At the same time, before the two groups of patients, their nursing needs such as related knowledge guidance, psychological distress and social support were not comparable. There is a big difference, but after the nursing, the research group using evidence-based nursing has better nursing effect, and the data has statistical significance (P <0.05).
Conclusion  : Evidence-based nursing is better in meeting the nursing needs of patients with different drainages after urological surgery, which can enable patients to further understand relevant health knowledge and improve their psychological status.