CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2020; 2: (3) 41; 352-354 ; DOI: DOI:10.12208/j.ijnr.20200107.

Implementation of systematic health care interventions at the postnatal center
系统化健康护理干预在月子中心的实施

作者: 施小璐 *

云南新昆华医院产后康复中心

*通讯作者: 施小璐,单位:云南新昆华医院产后康复中心;

发布时间: 2020-06-11 总浏览量: 875

摘要

目的 探究在月子中心实施系统化健康护理干预的临床应用效果。方法 本次对照实验中,于月子中心选取68例正处于产褥期的产妇作为本次实验的研究对象,在调查且符合入组标准后将其随机分配为参照组和研究组,每组34例患者,其中参照组使用常规护理,研究组在常规护理方式的基础上增加系统化健康护理干预,并对比产后其母乳喂养情况,SAS、SDS心理状态评分。结果 应用系统化健康护理干预的研究组,全母乳喂养21例,混合喂养12例,人工喂养1例;而应用常规护理的参照组,全母乳喂养14例,混合喂养11例,人工喂养9例,研究组在母乳喂养方面明显优于参照组,(P<0.05)。其次,护理干预后研究组产妇SAS、SDS评分分别为(40.19±8.26)分、(42.36±7.54)分;参照组分别为(49.65±7.46)分、(52.71±7.69)分,研究组产妇心理状态评分显著优于参照组,(P<0.05)。结论 在产褥期产妇护理工作中应用系统化健康护理干预可有效提高护理针对性,对提高护理质量,促进产妇快速康复有积极作用。

关键词: 系统化健康护理干预;常规护理;产褥期;心理状态;应用价值

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical application of systematic health care intervention in postnatal Center.
Methods In this control experiment, 68 cases of puerperium in the confinement center were selected as the research object of this experiment. After investigation and meeting the inclusion criteria, they were randomly assigned to the reference group and the study group, each group 34 Patients, of which the reference group used conventional nursing, the research group added systematic health care interventions on the basis of conventional nursing methods, and compared their breast-feeding status and SAS and SDS mental state scores.
Results The study group applying systemic health care interventions included 21 cases of total breastfeeding, 12 cases of mixed feeding, and 1 case of artificial feeding; and the reference group of routine nursing, 14 cases of total breastfeeding, 11 cases of mixed feeding, and 9 cases of artificial feeding For example, the study group was significantly better than the reference group in breastfeeding (P <0.05). Secondly, after the nursing intervention, the maternal SAS and SDS scores of the study group were (40.19 ± 8.26) points and (42.36 ± 7.54) points; the reference group was (49.65 ± 7.46) points and (52.71 ± 7.69) points, respectively. The status score was significantly better than the reference group (P <0.05).
Conclusion   The application of systematic health care interventions in maternal nursing work during puerperium can effectively improve the targetedness of nursing, improve the quality of nursing, and promote the rapid recovery of pregnant women.

Key words: Systematic Health Care Intervention; Routine Nursing; Puerperium; Psychological State; Application Value

参考文献 References

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

引用本文

施小璐, 系统化健康护理干预在月子中心的实施[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2020; 2: (3) : 352-354.