Application experience of continuous nursing quality improvement in cardiology nursing
持续护理质量改进在心内科护理中的应用体会

摘要

目的 研究持续护理质量改进在心内科护理中的临床使用效果。方法 选取62例心内科患者作为研究对象，采用分组式结果分析，按照1:1比例将患者分为观察组（n=31例）与对照组（n=31例），患者抽取时间段介于2019年3月到2020年2月期间。对照组心内科患者采用常规护理方式，观察组心内科患者需要运用持续护理质量改进方法，对比两组患者护理满意度，患者对医护人员工作质量评分。结果 观察组心内科患者采用持续护理质量改进法及护理满意度为93.55%，对照组心理科患者运用常规护理方法护理满意度为70.97%，数据对比存在差异，具有实际统计意义（P＜0.05）。观察组采用持续护理质量改进后医护人员应急能力评分为93.12±3.24分、沟通能力为90.65±5.22分、知识储备评分为95.31±4.36分，而对照组应用常规护理后，医护人员应急能力评分为70.36±12.64分、沟通能力为85.69±4.28分、知识储备为82.92±5.41分，观察组医护人员评分优于对照组，组间差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论 心内科患者采用持续护理质量改进，可以有效提升护理满意度，提高护理人员沟通能力、应急能力以及知识储备量，对患者病情恢复具有积极作用，值得临床推广使用。

Abstract

Objective: To study the clinical effect of continuous nursing quality improvement in cardiology nursing.
Methods: 62 patients with cardiology were selected as the research object, grouped results analysis was used, and patients were divided into observation group (n = 31 cases) and control group (n = 31 cases) according to 1: 1 ratio. From March 2019 to February 2020. The control group's cardiology patients adopted conventional nursing methods, and the observation group's cardiology patients needed to use continuous nursing quality improvement methods, comparing the satisfaction of nursing care between the two groups of patients, and the patient's work quality score for medical staff.
Results: The observation group ’s cardiology patients used continuous nursing quality improvement method and nursing satisfaction was 93.55%, and the control group ’s psychology patients used conventional nursing method for nursing satisfaction was 70.97%. There was a difference in data comparison, which had practical statistical significance (P <0.05). The observation group adopted continuous nursing quality improvement, and the emergency ability score of the medical staff was 93.12 ± 3.24 points, the communication ability was 90.65 ± 5.22 points, and the knowledge reserve score was 95.31 ± 4.36 points. After the control group applied routine care, the emergency ability score of the medical staff was 70.36 ± 12.64 points, communication ability was 85.69 ± 4.28 points, and knowledge reserve was 82.92 ± 5.41 points. The medical staff in the observation group scored better than the control group, and the difference between the groups was significant (P <0.05).
Conclusion  : The use of continuous nursing quality improvement in cardiology patients can effectively improve nursing satisfaction, improve the nursing staff's communication ability, emergency ability and knowledge reserve, and have a positive effect on the recovery of the patient's condition, which is worthy of clinical promotion and use.