期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2020; 2: (4) ; 460-462 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20200141.

Analysis of common nursing risk factors and preventive measures in infectious diseases department
分析感染性疾病科常见护理风险因素与防范措施

作者: 陈雪娟 *

云南省第一人民医院昆明理工大学附属医院感染性疾病科 云南 昆明

*通讯作者: 陈雪娟,单位:云南省第一人民医院昆明理工大学附属医院感染性疾病科 云南 昆明;

发布时间: 2020-07-15 总浏览量: 752

摘要

目的 对感染性疾病科常见护理风险因素进行研究,并分析不同护理方案的应用效果。方法 本次实验共计选取本院2019年3月-2020年3月期间就诊的98例感染性疾病科患者,通过抛硬币的方法将所选98例患者分为甲乙两组,两组患者人数相同。护理人员在实验过程中对甲组患者实施基础护理,在分析相关风险因素的基础上对乙组患者实施针对性护理,对两组患者风险事件出现情况、护理满意情况及住院时间进行统计和对比。结果 导致感染性疾病科护理风险的主要因素有医疗废物处置不规范、护理人员防范意识薄弱、相关规章制度不完善及护患沟通水平低;在风险事件出现方面,乙组患者远远少于甲组患者,风险事件出现方面表现出较大差异,数据呈现统计学意义(p<0.05);在护理满意情况,乙组患者显著高于甲组患者,护理满意度方面表现出较大差异,数据呈现统计学意义(p<0.05);在住院时间方面,甲组患者长于乙组患者,住院时间方面表现出较大差异,数据呈现统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论 相比基础护理,针对性护理在感染性疾病科护理风险防范方面效果更好,其能够在一定程度上减少风险事件的出现,促进患者护理满意度的提升,缩短患者住院时间,具有较高的临床价值。

关键词: 感染性疾病科;护理风险;住院时间;护理满意度

Abstract

Objective: To study the common nursing risk factors of infectious diseases department and analyze the application effect of different nursing programs.
Methods: In this experiment, a total of 98 patients with infectious diseases from March 2019 to March 2020 in our hospital were selected. The 98 patients selected were divided into two groups A and B by coin tossing, and the number of patients in the two groups was the same.During the experiment, the nursing staff carried out basic care for the patients in group A, and carried out targeted care for the patients in group B on the basis of analysis of relevant risk factors. Statistics and comparisons of the occurrence of risk events, nursing satisfaction, and hospitalization time of the patients in the two groups .
Results: The main factors leading to the nursing risk of infectious diseases department are the unstandardized disposal of medical waste, the weak awareness of nursing staff, the imperfect rules and regulations, and the low level of communication between nurses and patients; The patients in group A showed significant differences in the occurrence of risk events, and the data showed statistical significance (p <0.05). In terms of nursing satisfaction, patients in group B were significantly higher than those in group A, and there was a large difference in nursing satisfaction. The data showed statistical significance (p <0.05); in terms of hospitalization time, the patients in group A were longer than those in group B, and the hospitalization time showed a large difference, and the data showed statistical significance (p <0.05).
Conclusion  : Compared with basic nursing, targeted nursing has better effect on the prevention of nursing risks in infectious diseases department. It can reduce the occurrence of risk events to a certain extent, promote the improvement of patient care satisfaction, shorten the length of hospital stay, and has a higher clinical value.

Key words: Department of Infectious Diseases; Nursing Risk; Hospitalization Time; Nursing Satisfaction

参考文献 References

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

引用本文

陈雪娟, 分析感染性疾病科常见护理风险因素与防范措施[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2020; 2: (4) : 460-462.