Application of high-quality nursing in patients with coronary heart disease and angina pectoris
优质护理在冠心病心绞痛患者护理中的应用

摘要

目的 分析优质护理在冠心病心绞痛患者护理中的临床应用效果。方法 组内共选取了76例患者，均为我院心内科于2019年4月至2020年1月收治，均为冠心病心绞痛患者，在入组后按照护理方式的不同将患者随机分配为了对照组和观察组，每组38例患者，其中对照组使用常规护理，观察组在常规护理方式的基础上增加优质护理，对比两种不同护理方法的临床应用效果。结果 观察组心绞痛发作次数（6.07±1.16）次/d，心绞痛持续时间（2.13±0.47）min，平均住院时间（1.24±0.12）d，生活质量评分（95.64±3.59）分；对照组心绞痛发作次数、心绞痛持续时间、平均住院时间、生活质量评分等临床指标分别为（14.43±3.51）次/d、（4.86±1.58）min、（4.67±1.28）d、（84.13±3.48）分，观察组临床指标明显优于对照组，存在统计学意义，（P＜0.05）。其次，观察组非常满意24例，一般满意13例，不满意1例，满意度（97.36%），对照组非常满意、一般满意、不满意患者例数分别为20例、10例、8例，满意度（78.94%）。两组满意度之间差异较大，存在统计学意义，（P＜0.05）。结论 将优质护理应用于冠心病心绞痛患者的护理工作中有较高的护理针对性，对提升护理满意度有积极意义。

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical application effect of high-quality nursing in patients with coronary heart disease and angina pectoris.
Methods: A total of 76 patients were selected in the group, all of whom were admitted to our department of cardiology from April 2019 to January 2020. They were all patients with coronary heart disease and angina pectoris. After enrollment, the patients were randomly assigned to the control group and the observation group, each group of 38 patients, of which the control group uses routine nursing, the observation group adds high-quality nursing on the basis of conventional nursing methods, and compares the clinical application effects of two different nursing methods.
Results: The number of angina attacks in the observation group was (6.07 ± 1.16) times / d, the duration of angina pectoris was (2.13 ± 0.47) min, the average hospital stay was (1.24 ± 0.12) d, and the quality of life score was (95.64 ± 3.59) points; The clinical indicators such as frequency, duration of angina pectoris, average length of hospital stay, and quality of life score were (14.43 ± 3.51) times / d, (4.86 ± 1.58) min, (4.67 ± 1.28) d, (84.13 ± 3.48) points. The clinical indicators of the observation group were significantly better than the control group, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Secondly, the observation group was very satisfied with 24 cases, generally satisfied with 13 cases, dissatisfied with 1 case, and satisfaction (97.36%). The control group had 20, 10, and 8 patients with very satisfactory, general satisfaction, and dissatisfaction, respectively. The satisfaction was (78.94%). There was a big difference between the two groups in satisfaction, which was statistically significant (P <0.05).
Conclusion  : Applying high-quality nursing to the nursing work of patients with coronary heart disease and angina pectoris has a higher nursing pertinence, which has a positive significance for improving nursing satisfaction.