期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Nursing Research. 2020; 2: (6) ; 795-797 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijnr.20200248.

Analysis of nursing effect of clinical nursing path on bronchial asthma
临床护理路径对支气管哮喘的护理效果分析

作者: 李兆琼 *

云南省第一人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科 云南昆明

*通讯作者: 李兆琼,单位:云南省第一人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科 云南昆明;

发布时间: 2020-10-27 总浏览量: 683

摘要

目的 研究支气管哮喘患者采用临床护理路径的效果。方法 抽取我院呼吸内科98例支气管哮喘患者,采用分组式结果分析,按照1:1比例将该98例患者分为观察组(49例)与对照组(49例),患者抽取时间段介于2019年1月到2019年8月期间。对照组支气管哮喘患者采用常规护理方式,观察组支气管哮喘患者需要运用临床护理路径,研究期间需要护理人员做好记录工作,对比两组患者护理有效率、活动受限、临床症状、情感功能以及疾病认知度评分。结果 观察组支气管哮喘患者采用临床护理路径活动受限评分为29.15±2.98分、临床症状评分为39.15±2.12分、情感功能评分为28.69±4.02分、疾病认知度评分为92.36±8.55分,对照组支气管哮喘患者运用常规护理方式活动首先评分为21.06±3.09分、临床症状评分为28.35±4.03分、情感功能评分为23.44±3.42分、疾病认知度为80.36±7.23分,观察组患者评分优于对照组,组间差异显著(P<0.05)。此外,观察组患者治疗有效率优于对照组,数据对比存在差异,具有实际统计意义。结论 支气管哮喘患者采用临床护理路径可以有效提升治疗效果,提升患者疾病认知度,减少疾病反复发作率,值得临床推广使用。

关键词: 临床护理路径;支气管哮喘;护理效果

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of clinical nursing pathway in patients with bronchial asthma.
Methods: A total of 98 patients with bronchial asthma were selected from the Department of Respiratory Medicine of our hospital. Using grouped results analysis, the 98 patients were divided into an observation group (49 cases) and a control group (49 cases) at a 1: 1 ratio. From January 2019 to August 2019. The control group patients with bronchial asthma adopt routine nursing methods, the observation group patients with bronchial asthma need to use clinical nursing pathways, and the nursing staff need to make good records during the study period, comparing the two groups of patients with nursing efficiency, limited activity, clinical symptoms, emotional function and disease awareness score.
Results: Observation group bronchial asthma patients adopted the clinical nursing pathway activity limitation score of 29.15 ± 2.98 points, clinical symptom score of 39.15 ± 2.12 points, emotional function score of 28.69 ± 4.02 points, disease recognition score of 92.36 ± 8.55 points. The patients with bronchial asthma in the control group were scored 21.06 ± 3.09 points, 28.35 ± 4.03 points in clinical symptoms, 23.44 ± 3.42 points in emotional function, 80.36 ± 7.23 points in disease recognition in the observation group, which is better than the control group. The difference between the groups is significant (P <0.05). In addition, the treatment efficiency of the observation group is better than that of the control group, and there is a difference in data comparison, which has practical statistical significance.
Conclusion  : The use of clinical nursing pathways in patients with bronchial asthma can effectively improve the treatment effect, improve the patients' awareness of the disease, and reduce the recurrence rate of the disease, which is worthy of clinical promotion and use.

Key words: Clinical Nursing Path; Bronchial Asthma; Nursing Effect

参考文献 References

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

引用本文

李兆琼, 临床护理路径对支气管哮喘的护理效果分析[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2020; 2: (6) : 795-797.