Comprehensive assessment of the impact of nursing on quality of life in elderly patients
综合评估护理在老年患者护理中对生活质量的影响

摘要

目的 分析老年综合评估护理用于老年病人的价值。方法 2021年3月-12月本院接诊老年病人200名，随机均分2组。试验组采取老年综合评估护理，对照组行常规护理。对比sf-36评分等指标。结果 从WHOQOL-100评分上看，干预后：试验组（89.47±3.65）分，和对照组（80.28±4.93）分相比更高（P＜0.05）。从满意度上看，试验组99.0%，和对照组88.0%相比更高（P＜0.05）。从SDS和SAS评分上看，干预后：试验组得分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。从不良事件上看，试验组发生率1.0%，和对照组9.0%相比更低（P＜0.05）。从护理质量上看，试验组高于对照组（92.96±2.48），且住院时间用时比对照组更短（P＜0.05）。结论 老年病人用老年综合评估护理，效果好，生活质量改善明显，负性情绪缓解更为迅速，不良事件发生率更低，住院时间更短。

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the value of elderly comprehensive evaluation nursing for elderly patients.
Methods: From March to December 2021,our hospital received 200 elderly patients, and they were randomly divided into 2 groups. The trial group took comprehensive geriatric assessment care, and the control group underwent routine care. Contrast the sf-36 score and other indicators.
Results: From the WHOQOL-100 score, postintervention: the test group (89.47±3.65) was higher than the control group (80.28±4.93) (P<0.05). In terms of satisfaction, 99.0%of the test group was higher than 88.0%of the control group (P<0.05). For both the SDS and SAS scores, the test group score was lower than the control group (P<0.05). In terms of adverse events, the incidence of the trial group was 1.0%,which was lower than 9.0%in the control group (P<0.05). In terms of the quality of care, the test group was higher than the control group (92.96±2.48), and the length of hospital stay was shorter than the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : Elderly patients have good results, significantly improved quality of life, faster relief of negative mood, lower incidence of adverse events, and shorter hospital stay.