摘要
目的 观察分析脊柱肿瘤患者实施全脊椎切除术治疗过程中综合护理干预配合作用，希望能够进一步减少术后并发症，减轻患者负性情绪，提高患者满意度。方法 基于自愿与知情同意原则，将本院于2019年11月--2021年11月纳入的90例脊柱肿瘤患者作为研究主体，通过数字随机表法设为常规组、研究组，各45例，其中常规组患者实施全脊椎切除术过程中辅以普通护理，研究组患者实施全脊椎切除术过程中辅以综合护理干预。观察对比分析两组术后并发症发生率、负性情绪评分、总满意度。结果 研究组术后并发症明显少于常规组（p<0.05）；研究组负性情绪SDS抑郁心态评分与SAS焦虑心态评分显著低于常规组（p<0.05）；研究组总满意度高于常规组（p<0.05）。结论 综合护理干预能够进一步减少脊柱肿瘤患者全脊椎切除术后并发症，减轻患者负性情绪，促使患者满意度提升，值得现代临床广泛借鉴。
关键词： 脊柱肿瘤；全脊椎切除术；综合护理；负性情绪；并发症；满意度
Abstract
Objective To observe and analyze the cooperative effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in the process of total spondylectomy for patients with spinal tumors, hoping to further reduce postoperative complications, reduce patients' negative emotions, and improve patient satisfaction. Methods Based on the principle of voluntary and informed consent, 90 patients with spinal tumors who were enrolled in our hospital from November 2019 to November 2021 were selected as the research subjects. Among them, patients in the routine group were supplemented with general nursing during total spondylectomy, and patients in the study group were supplemented with comprehensive nursing intervention during total spondylectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications, negative emotion score, and total satisfaction were observed and compared between the two groups. Results The postoperative complications in the study group were significantly less than those in the conventional group (p<0.05); the negative emotion SDS depression mentality score and SAS anxiety mentality score in the study group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (p<0.05); the total satisfaction in the study group was higher than that in the study group Conventional group (p<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can further reduce the complications after total spondylectomy in patients with spinal tumors, reduce the negative emotions of patients, and promote the improvement of patient satisfaction, which is worthy of extensive reference in modern clinical practice.
Key words： Spinal Tumor; Total Spondylectomy; Comprehensive Nursing; Negative Emotions; Complications; Satisfaction
参考文献 References
[1] 朱英杰,王文利.多学科协作疼痛管理模式对老年胸腰段脊柱肿瘤患者术后疼痛和生活质量的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2021,28(01):95-97.
[2] Bess Shay, Line Breton, Lafage Renaud, et al. 212. Matched analysis demonstrates acute rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility care does not reduce readmissions, return to surgery or improve outcomes compared to home discharge following adult spine deformity surgery[J]. The Spine Journal, 2021, 21(9S):S108-S109.
[3] 杨春霞,程莲,赵静.综合性护理干预在脊柱肿瘤手术患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(14):17-19.
[4] 刘惠玉,刘晓梅.整体护理对降低脊柱肿瘤术后患者相关并发症及焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响[J].长春中医药大学学报,2019,35(04):758-760.
[5] Cowperthwaite Suzanne M, Kozachik Sharon L. Improving the Pain Experience for Hospitalized Patients With Cancer.[J]. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2019, 46(2): 198-207.
[6] 郑元,王卫东,王彦艳,等.脊柱肿瘤后路全脊椎整块切除并脊柱重建术中风险预警分析及护理对策[J].中华现代护理杂志,2018,24(20):2455-2458.
[7] 潘学娟,张丽娜,姜丽,等.加速康复外科护理在椎管内肿瘤切除合并脊柱内固定患者中的应用[J].中国临床研究,2018,31(05):707-709.
[8] 肖霞.脊柱肿瘤前后联合入路切除术的围手术期护理措施探讨[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2018,25(S1):265+267.
[9] 龚晓丽,瞿莉,周萍.渐进式康复护理对脊柱肿瘤患者术后生活质量及心理状态的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2017, 24(06):749-753.
[10] 刘小艳,陈慧,申燕,等.系统护理干预对转移性脊柱肿瘤患者手术切除治疗后的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2017, 24(06): 754-756.
[11] 梁金镇,陈霞.家庭支持对脊柱肿瘤术后稳定性重建患者心理韧性的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(16):4-6.
[12] 杜红梅,陈广栋.脊柱肿瘤患者围手术期疼痛规划化管理的临床效果及对睡眠质量的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2016,23(05):609-612.
[13] 彭丽娟.脊柱肿瘤前后联合入路切除术围手术期护理分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(04):514-515.
[14] 潘丽芬,谭淑芳,刘婉玲,等.脊柱恶性肿瘤切除联合放射治疗的术中护理配合[J].中华护理杂志,2015,50(09): 1149-1151.
[15] 苏晓静,薛传娟,屈波.严重脊柱侧后凸畸形患者行后路全脊椎切除术的护理[J].解放军护理杂志,2015,32(05): 40-42+60.